InfoDotInc / archive systemEstablished online record · rebuilding deliberately
InfoDotInc

Technical documents, historic paths, and source-backed reference material.

Archive / FAA Helicopter Flying Handbook / FAA Helicopter Flying Handbook: Chapter 7 — Helicopter Performance

Chapter 7 — Helicopter Performance

Chapter 7 — Helicopter Performance — Part 6

FAA-H-8083-21B (2019)

Helicopters that do not have the throttle control located on

the collective are generally exceptions to basic technique

and require some additional prudence. The autorotation

should be initiated with the power levers left in the “flight,”

or normal, position. If a full touchdown is to be practiced, it

is common technique to move the power levers to the idle

position once the landing area can safely be reached. In most

helicopters, the pilot is fully committed at that point to make

a power-off landing. However, it may be possible to make

a power recovery prior to passing through 100 feet AGL if

the powerplant can recover within that time period and the

instructor is very proficient. The pilot should comply with

the RFM instructions in all cases.

When practicing autorotations to a power recovery, the

differences between reciprocating engines and turbines

may be profound. The reciprocating powerplant generally

responds very quickly to power changes, especially power

increases. Some turbines have delay times depending on

the type of fuel control or governing system installed. Any

reciprocating engine needing turbocharged boost to develop

rated horse power may have significant delays to demands

for increased power, such as in the power recovery. Power

recovery in those helicopters with slower engine response

times must have the engines begin to develop enough power

to rejoin the needles by approximately 100 feet AGL.

If a go-around is to be made, the cyclic control should be

moved forward to resume forward flight. In transition from

a practice autorotation to a go-around, exercise caution to

avoid an altitude-airspeed combination that would place the

helicopter in an unsafe area of its height/velocity diagram.

This is one of the most difficult maneuvers to perform due to

the concentration needed when transitioning from powered

flight to autorotation and then back again to powered flight.

For helicopters equipped with the power control on the

collective, engine power must be brought from flight power

to idle power and then back to a flight power setting. A delay

during any of these transitions can seriously affect rotor rpm

placing the helicopter in a situation that cannot be recovered.

The cyclic must be adjusted to maintain the required

airspeed without power, and then used for the deceleration

flare, followed by the transition to level hovering flight.

Additionally, the cyclic must be adjusted to remove the

compensation for translating tendency. The tail rotor is

no longer needed to produce antitorque thrust until almost

maximum power is applied to the rotor disk for hovering

flight, when the tail rotor must again compensate for the main

rotor torque, which also demands compensation for the tail

rotor thrust and translating tendency.

The pedals must be adjusted from a powered flight anti-

torque trim setting to the opposite trim setting to compensate

for transmission drag and any unneeded vertical fin thrust

countering the now nonexistent torque and then reset to

compensate for the high power required for hovering flight.

All of the above must be accomplished during the 23 seconds

of the autorotation, and the quick, precise control inputs must

be made in the last 5 seconds of the maneuver.

Common Errors

1. Initiating recovery too late, which requires a rapid

application of controls and results in overcontrolling.

2. Failure to obtain and maintain a level attitude near the

surface.

3. Failure to coordinate throttle and collective pitch

properly, which results in either an engine overspeed

or a loss of rotor rpm.

4. Failure to coordinate proper antitorque pedal with the

increase in power.

5. Late engine power engagement causing excessive

temperature or torque, or rpm drop.

6. Failure to go around if not within limits and specified

criteria for safe autorotation.

Practicing Power Failure in a Hover

Power failure in a hover, also called hovering autorotation, is

practiced so that a pilot can automatically make the correct

response when confronted with engine stoppage or certain

other emergencies while hovering. The techniques discussed

in this section are for helicopters with a counterclockwise

rotor disk and an antitorque rotor.

Technique (How to Practice)

To practice hovering autorotation, establish a normal

hovering height (approximately 2–3 feet) for the particular

helicopter being used, considering load and atmospheric

conditions. Keep the helicopter headed into the wind and

hold maximum allowable rpm.

To simulate a power failure, firmly roll the throttle to the

engine idle position. This disengages the driving force of the

engine from the rotor, thus eliminating torque effect. As the

throttle is closed, apply proper antitorque pedal to maintain

heading. Usually, a slight amount of right cyclic control is

necessary to keep the helicopter from drifting to the left, to

compensate for the loss of tail rotor thrust. However, use

cyclic control, as required, to ensure a vertical descent and

a level attitude. Do not adjust the collective on entry.

Helicopters with low inertia rotor disks settle immediately.

Keep a level attitude and ensure a vertical descent with cyclic

control while maintaining heading with the pedals. Any lateral

movement must be avoided to prevent dynamic rollover. As

rotor rpm decays, cyclic response decreases, so compensation

for the winds will require more cyclic input. At approximately

1 foot AGL, apply upward collective control, as necessary,

to slow the descent and cushion the landing without arresting

the rate of descent above the surface. Usually, the full amount

of collective is required just as the landing gear touches the

surface. As upward collective control is applied, the throttle

must be held in the idle detent position to prevent the engine

from re-engaging. The idle detention position is a ridged stop

position between idle and off in which the idle release button

snaps into, prevent accidental throttle off.

Helicopters with high-inertia rotor disks settle more slowly

after the throttle is closed. In this case, when the helicopter has

settled to approximately 1 foot AGL, apply upward collective

control while holding the throttle in the idle detent position

to slow the descent and cushion the landing. The timing of

collective control application and the rate at which it is applied

depend upon the particular helicopter being used, its gross

weight, and the existing atmospheric conditions. Cyclic control

is used to maintain a level attitude and to ensure a vertical

descent. Maintain heading with antitorque pedals.

When the weight of the helicopter is entirely resting on

the landing gear, cease application of upward collective.

When the helicopter has come to a complete stop, lower the

collective pitch to the full-down position.

The timing of the collective movement is a very important

consideration. If it is applied too soon, the remaining rpm may

not be sufficient to make a soft landing. On the other hand,

if it is applied too late, surface contact may be made before

sufficient blade pitch is available to cushion the landing.

The collective must not be used to hold the helicopter off

the surface, causing a blade stall. Low rotor rpm and ensuing

blade stall can result in a total loss of rotor lift, allowing the

helicopter to fall to the surface and possibly resulting in blade

strikes to the tail boom and other airframe damage such as

landing gear damage, transmission mount deformation, and

fuselage cracking.

Common Errors

1. Failure to use sufficient proper antitorque pedal when

power is reduced.

2. Failure to stop all sideward or backward movement

prior to touchdown.

3. Failure to apply up-collective pitch properly, resulting

in a hard touchdown.

4. Failure to touch down in a level attitude.

5. Failure to roll the throttle completely to idle.

6. Failure to hover at a safe altitude for the helicopter

type, atmospheric conditions, and the level of training/

proficiency of the pilot.

7. Failure to go around if not within limits and specified

criteria for safe autorotation.

Vortex Ring State

Vortex ring state (formerly referenced as settling-with-

power) describes an aerodynamic condition in which a

helicopter may be in a vertical descent with 20 percent up to

maximum power applied, and little or no climb performance.

The previously used term settling-with-power came from the

fact that the helicopter keeps settling even though full engine

power is applied.

In a normal out-of-ground-effect (OGE) hover, the helicopter

is able to remain stationary by propelling a large mass of air

down through the main rotor. Some of the air is recirculated

near the tips of the blades, curling up from the bottom of

the rotor disk and rejoining the air entering the rotor from

the top. This phenomenon is common to all airfoils and is

known as tip vortices. Tip vortices generate drag and degrade

airfoil efficiency. As long as the tip vortices are small, their

only effect is a small loss in rotor efficiency. However, when

the helicopter begins to descend vertically, it settles into its

own downwash, which greatly enlarges the tip vortices. In

this vortex ring state, most of the power developed by the

engine is wasted in circulating the air in a doughnut pattern

around the rotor.

In addition, the helicopter may descend at a rate that exceeds

the normal downward induced-flow rate of the inner blade

sections. As a result, the airflow of the inner blade sections is

upward relative to the disk. This produces a secondary vortex

ring in addition to the normal tip vortices. The secondary

vortex ring is generated about the point on the blade where the

airflow changes from up to down. The result is an unsteady

turbulent flow over a large area of the disk. Rotor efficiency

is lost even though power is still being supplied from the

engine. [Figure 11-3]

A fully developed vortex ring state is characterized by an

unstable condition in which the helicopter experiences

uncommanded pitch and roll oscillations, has little or no

collective authority, and achieves a descent rate that may

approach 6,000 feet per minute (fpm) if allowed to develop.

A vortex ring state may be entered during any maneuver

that places the main rotor in a condition of descending in a

column of disturbed air and low forward airspeed. Airspeeds

Figure 11-3. Vortex ring state.

that are below translational lift airspeeds are within this

region of susceptibility to vortex ring state aerodynamics.

This condition is sometimes seen during quick-stop type

maneuvers or during recovery from autorotation.

The following combination of conditions is likely to cause

settling in a vortex ring state in any helicopter:

1. A vertical or nearly vertical descent of at least 300

fpm. (Actual critical rate depends on the gross weight,

rpm, density altitude, and other pertinent factors.)

2. The rotor disk must be using some of the available

engine power (20–100 percent).

3. The horizontal velocity must be slower than effective

translational lift.

Situations that are conducive to a vortex ring state condition

are attempting to hover OGE without maintaining precise

altitude control, and approaches, especially steep approaches,

with a tailwind component.

When recovering from a vortex ring state condition, the pilot

tends first to try to stop the descent by increasing collective

pitch. However, this only results in increasing the stalled

area of the rotor, thereby increasing the rate of descent. Since

inboard portions of the blades are stalled, cyclic control

may be limited. The traditional recovery is accomplished

by increasing airspeed, and/or partially lowering collective

to exit the vortex. In most helicopters, lateral cyclic thrust

combined with an increase in power and lateral antitorque

thrust will produce the quickest exit from the hazard. This

technique, known as the Vuichard Recovery (named after the

Swiss examiner from the Federal Office of Civil Aviation

who developed it) recovers by eliminating the descent rate as

opposed to exiting the vortex. If the vortex ring state and the

corresponding descent rate is allowed to progress to what is

called the windmill brake state, the point where the airflow

is completely up through the rotor, the only recovery may

be an autorotation.

Tandem rotor helicopters should maneuver laterally to

achieve clean air in both rotors at the same time.

For vortex ring state demonstrations and training in

recognition and recovery should be performed from a safe

altitude to allow recovery no less than 1000 feet AGL or the

manufacturer’s recommended altitude, whichever is higher.

To enter the maneuver, come to an OGE hover, maintaining

little or no airspeed (any direction), decrease collective

to begin a vertical descent, and as the turbulence begins,

increase collective. Then allow the sink rate to increase to 300

fpm or more as the attitude is adjusted to obtain airspeed of

less than 10 knots. When the aircraft begins to shudder, the

application of additional up collective increases the vibration

and sink rate. As the power is increased, the rate of sink of

the aircraft in the column of air will increase.

If altitude is sufficient, some time can be spent in the

vortices, to enable the pilot to develop a healthy knowledge

of the maneuver. However, helicopter pilots would normally

initiate recovery at the first indication of vortex ring state.

Recovery should be initiated at the first sign of vortex ring

state by applying forward cyclic to increase airspeed and/ or

simultaneously reducing collective. The recovery is complete

when the aircraft passes through effective translational lift

and a normal climb is established.

Common Errors—Traditional Recovery

1. Too much lateral speed for entry into vortex ring state.

2. Excessive decrease of collective.

Common Errors—Vuichard Recovery

1. Excessive lateral cyclic

2. Failure to maintain heading

Retreating Blade Stall

In forward flight, the relative airflow through the main rotor

disk is different on the advancing and retreating side. The

relative airflow over the advancing side is higher due to the

forward speed of the helicopter, while the relative airflow on

the retreating side is lower. This dissymmetry of lift increases

as forward speed increases.

To generate the same amount of lift across the rotor disk,

the advancing blade flaps up while the retreating blade flaps

down. This causes the AOA to decrease on the advancing

116°

122°

122°

Figure 11-4. Ground resonance.

blade, which reduces lift, and increase on the retreating blade,

which increases lift. At some point as the forward speed

increases, the low blade speed on the retreating blade, and

its high AOA cause a stall and loss of lift.

Retreating blade stall is a factor in limiting a helicopter’s

never-exceed speed (V NE) and its development can be felt

by a low frequency vibration, pitching up of the nose, and

a roll in the direction of the retreating blade. High weight,

low rotor rpm, high density altitude, turbulence and/or

steep, abrupt turns are all conducive to retreating blade stall

at high forward airspeeds. As altitude is increased, higher

blade angles are required to maintain lift at a given airspeed.

Thus, retreating blade stall is encountered at a lower forward

airspeed at altitude. Most manufacturers publish charts and

graphs showing a VNE decrease with altitude.

When recovering from a retreating blade stall condition

caused by high airspeed, moving the cyclic aft only worsens

the stall as aft cyclic produces a flare effect, thus increasing

the AOA. Pushing forward on the cyclic also deepens

the stall as the AOA on the retreating blade is increased.

While the first step in a proper recovery is usually to reduce

collective, RBS should be evaluated in light of the relevant

factors discussed in the previous paragraph and addressed

accordingly. For example, if a pilot at high weight and high

DA is about to conduct a high reconnaissance prior to a

confined area operation where rolling into a steep turn causes

onset of RBS, the recovery is to roll out of the turn. If the

cause is low rotor rpm, then increase the rpm.

Common Errors

1. Failure to recognize the combination of contributing

factors leading to retreating blade stall.

2. Failure to compute VNE limits for altitudes to be flown.

Ground Resonance

Helicopters with articulating rotors (usually designs with

three or more main rotor blades) are subject to ground

resonance, a destructive vibration phenomenon that occurs

at certain rotor speeds when the helicopter is on the ground.

Ground resonance is a mechanical design issue that results

from the helicopter’s airframe having a natural frequency that

can be intensified by an out-of-balance rotor. The unbalanced

rotor disk vibrates at the same frequency (or multiple thereof)

of the airframe’s resonant frequency, and the harmonic

oscillation increases because the engine is adding power

to the system, increasing the magnitude (amplitude) of the

vibrations until the structure or structures fail. This condition

can cause a helicopter to self-destruct in a matter of seconds.

Hard contact with the ground on one corner (and usually

with wheel-type landing gear) can send a shockwave to

the main rotor head, resulting in the blades of a three-blade

rotor disk moving from their normal 120° relationship to

each other. This movement occurs along the drag hinge and

could result in something like 122°, 122°, and 116° between

blades. [Figure 11-4] When another part of the landing gear

strikes the surface, the unbalanced condition could be further

aggravated.

If the rpm is low, the only corrective action to stop ground

resonance is to close the throttle immediately and fully lower

the collective to place the blades in low pitch. If the rpm is in

the normal operating range, fly the helicopter off the ground,

and allow the blades to rephase themselves automatically.

Then, make a normal touchdown. If a pilot lifts off and allows

the helicopter to firmly re-contact the surface before the

blades are realigned, a second shock could move the blades

again and aggravate the already unbalanced condition. This

could lead to a violent, uncontrollable oscillation.

This situation does not occur in rigid or semi-rigid rotor

disks because there is no drag hinge. In addition, skid-type

landing gear is not as prone to ground resonance as wheel-

type landing gear, since the rubber tires' resonant frequency

typically can match that of the spinning rotor, unlike the

condition of a rigid landing gear.

Dynamic Rollover

A helicopter is susceptible to a lateral rolling tendency,

called dynamic rollover, when it is in contact with the surface

Tail rotor thrust

Tip-path plane neutral cyclic

Tip-path plane full left cyclic

Bank

angle

Pivot point

CG

Weight

Main rotor thrust

Figure 11-5. Forces acting on a helicopter with right skid on the

ground.

during takeoffs or landings. For dynamic rollover to occur,

some factor must first cause the helicopter to roll or pivot

around a skid or landing gear wheel, until its critical rollover

angle is reached. The angle at which dynamic rollover

occurs will vary based on helicopter type. Then, beyond

this point, main rotor thrust continues the roll and recovery

is impossible. After this angle is achieved, the cyclic does

not have sufficient range of control to eliminate the thrust

component and convert it to lift. If the critical rollover angle

is exceeded, the helicopter rolls on its side regardless of the

cyclic corrections made.

Dynamic rollover begins when the helicopter starts to pivot

laterally around its skid or wheel. For dynamic rollover to

occur the following three factors must be present:

1. A rolling moment

2. A pivot point other than the helicopter’s normal CG

3. Thrust greater than weight

This can occur for a variety of reasons, including the failure

to remove a tie down or skid-securing device, or if the skid

or wheel contacts a fixed object while hovering sideward,

or if the gear is stuck in ice, soft asphalt, or mud. Dynamic

rollover may also occur if you use an improper landing or

takeoff technique or while performing slope operations.

Whatever the cause, dynamic rollover is possible if not using

the proper corrective technique.

Once started, dynamic rollover cannot be stopped by

application of opposite cyclic control alone. For example,

the right skid contacts an object and becomes the pivot point

while the helicopter starts rolling to the right. Even with full

left cyclic applied, the main rotor thrust vector and its moment

follows the aircraft as it continues rolling to the right. Quickly

reducing collective pitch is the most effective way to stop

dynamic rollover from developing. Dynamic rollover can

occur with any type of landing gear and all types of rotor disks.

It is important to remember rotor blades have a limited range

of movement. If the tilt or roll of the helicopter exceeds that

range (5–8°), the controls (cyclic) can no longer command a

vertical lift component and the thrust or lift becomes a lateral

force that rolls the helicopter over. When limited rotor blade

movement is coupled with the fact that most of a helicopter’s

weight is high in the airframe, another element of risk is added

to an already slightly unstable center of gravity. Pilots must

remember that in order to remove thrust, the collective must

be lowered as this is the only recovery technique available.

Critical Conditions

Certain conditions reduce the critical rollover angle, thus

increasing the possibility for dynamic rollover and reducing

the chance for recovery. The rate of rolling motion is also

a consideration because, as the roll rate increases, there is

a reduction of the critical rollover angle at which recovery

is still possible. Other critical conditions include operating

at high gross weights with thrust (lift) approximately equal

to the weight.

Refer to Figure 11-5. The following conditions are most

critical for helicopters with counterclockwise rotor rotation:

1. Right side skid or landing wheel down, since

translating tendency adds to the rollover force.

2. Right lateral center of gravity (CG).

3. Crosswinds from the left.

4. Left yaw inputs.

For helicopters with clockwise rotor rotation, the opposite

conditions would be true.

Cyclic Trim

When maneuvering with one skid or wheel on the ground,

care must be taken to keep the helicopter cyclic control

carefully adjusted. For example, if a slow takeoff is attempted

and the cyclic is not positioned and adjusted to account for

translating tendency, the critical recovery angle may be

exceeded in less than two seconds. Control can be maintained

if the pilot maintains proper cyclic position and does not

allow the helicopter’s roll and pitch rates to become too

great. Fly the helicopter into the air smoothly while keeping

movements of pitch, roll, and yaw small; do not allow any

abrupt cyclic pressures.

Tail rotor thrust

Area of critical rollover

Horizontal

Slope

Full opposite cyclic limit

to prevent rolling motion

Figure 11-6. Upslope rolling motion.

Tail rotor thrust

Area of critical rollover

Horizontal

Slope

Full opposite cyclic limit

to prevent rolling motion

Figure 11-7. Downslope rolling motion.

Normal Takeoffs and Landings

Dynamic rollover is possible even during normal takeoffs and

landings on relatively level ground, if one wheel or skid is on

the ground and thrust (lift) is approximately equal to the weight

of the helicopter. If the takeoff or landing is not performed

properly, a roll rate could develop around the wheel or skid

that is on the ground. When taking off or landing, perform the

maneuver smoothly and carefully adjust the cyclic so that no

pitch or roll movement rates build up, especially the roll rate.

If the bank angle starts to increase to an angle of approximately

5–8°, and full corrective cyclic does not reduce the angle, the

collective should be reduced to diminish the unstable rolling

condition. Excessive bank angles can also be caused by landing

gear caught in a tie down strap, or a tie down strap still attached

to one side of the helicopter. Lateral loading imbalance (usually

outside published limits) is another contributing factor.

Slope Takeoffs and Landings

During slope operations, excessive application of cyclic

control into the slope, together with excessive collective pitch

control, can result in the downslope skid or landing wheel

rising sufficiently to exceed lateral cyclic control limits, and

an upslope rolling motion can occur. [Figure 11-6]

When performing slope takeoff and landing maneuvers, follow

the published procedures and keep the roll rates small. Slowly

raise the downslope skid or wheel to bring the helicopter level,

and then lift off. During landing, first touch down on the

upslope skid or wheel, then slowly lower the downslope skid

or wheel using combined movements of cyclic and collective.

If the helicopter rolls approximately 5–8° to the upslope side,

decrease collective to correct the bank angle and return to level

attitude, then start the landing procedure again.

Use of Collective

The collective is more effective in controlling the rolling

motion than lateral cyclic, because it reduces the main rotor

thrust (lift). A smooth, moderate collective reduction, at a

rate of less than approximately full up to full down in two

seconds, may be adequate to stop the rolling motion. Take

care, therefore, not to dump collective at an excessively high

rate, as this may cause a main rotor blade to strike the fuselage.

Additionally, if the helicopter is on a slope and the roll starts

toward the upslope side, reducing collective too fast may create

a high roll rate in the opposite direction. When the upslope skid

or wheel hits the ground, the dynamics of the motion can cause

the helicopter to bounce off the upslope skid or wheel, and the

inertia can cause the helicopter to roll about the downslope

ground contact point and over on its side. [Figure 11-7]

Under normal conditions on a slope, the collective should

not be pulled suddenly to get airborne because a large and

abrupt rolling moment in the opposite direction could occur.

Excessive application of collective can result in the upslope

skid or wheel rising sufficiently to exceed lateral cyclic

control limits. This movement may be uncontrollable. If the

helicopter develops a roll rate with one skid or wheel on the

ground, the helicopter can roll over on its side.

Precautions

To help avoid dynamic rollover:

1. Always practice hovering autorotations into the wind,

and be wary when the wind is gusty or greater than 10

knots.

2. Use extreme caution when hovering close to fences,

sprinklers, bushes, runway/taxi lights, tiedown cables,

deck nets, or other obstacles that could catch a skid or

wheel. Aircraft parked on hot asphalt overnight might

find the landing gear sunk in and stuck as the ramp

cooled during the evening.

3. Always use a two-step lift-off. Pull in just enough

collective pitch control to be light on the skids

or landing wheels and feel for equilibrium, then

gently lift the helicopter into the air. 4.

Hover high enough to have adequate skid or landing

wheel clearance from any obstacles when practicing

hovering maneuvers close to the ground, especially

when practicing sideways or rearward flight.

5. Remember that when the wind is coming from

the upslope direction, less lateral cyclic control is

available.

6. Avoid tailwind conditions when conducting slope

operations.

7. Remember that less lateral cyclic control is available

due to the translating tendency of the tail rotor when

the left skid or landing wheel is upslope. (This is true

for counterclockwise rotor disks.)

8. Keep in mind that the lateral cyclic requirement changes

when passengers or cargo are loaded or unloaded.

9. Be aware that if the helicopter utilizes interconnecting

fuel lines that allow fuel to automatically transfer from

one side of the helicopter to the other, the gravitational

flow of fuel to the downslope tank could change the

CG, resulting in a different amount of cyclic control

application to obtain the same lateral result.

10. Do not allow the cyclic limits to be reached. If the

cyclic control limit is reached, further lowering of the

collective may cause mast bumping. If this occurs,

return to a hover and select a landing point with a

lesser degree of slope.

11. During a takeoff from a slope, begin by leveling the

main rotor disk with the horizon or very slightly into

the slope to ensure vertical lift and only enough lateral

thrust to prevent sliding on the slope. If the upslope

skid or wheel starts to leave the ground before the

downslope skid or wheel, smoothly and gently lower

the collective and check to see if the downslope skid or

wheel is caught on something. Under these conditions,

vertical ascent is the only acceptable method of lift-off.

12. Be aware that dynamic rollover can be experienced

during flight operations on a floating platform if the

platform is pitching/rolling while attempting to land

or takeoff. Generally, the pilot operating on floating

platforms (barges, ships, etc.) observes a cycle of seven

during which the waves increase and then decrease to

a minimum. It is that time of minimum wave motion

that the pilot needs to use for the moment of landing

or takeoff on floating platforms. Pilots operating from

floating platforms should also exercise great caution

concerning cranes, masts, nearby boats (tugs) and nets.

Low-G Conditions and Mast Bumping

“G” is an abbreviation for acceleration due to the earth’s

gravity. A person standing on the ground or sitting in an

aircraft in level flight is experiencing one G. An aircraft in a

tight, banked turn with the pilot being pressed into the seat

is experiencing more than one G or high-G conditions. A

person beginning a downward ride in an elevator or riding

down a steep track on a roller coaster is experiencing less

than one G or low-G conditions. The best way for a pilot to

recognize low G is a weightless feeling similar to the start

of a downward elevator ride.

Helicopters rely on positive G to provide much or all of their

response to pilot control inputs. The pilot uses the cyclic

to tilt the rotor disk, and, at one G, the rotor is producing

thrust equal to aircraft weight. The tilting of the thrust

vector provides a moment about the center of gravity to

pitch or roll the fuselage. In a low-G condition, the thrust

and consequently the control authority are greatly reduced.

Although their control ability is reduced, multi-bladed (three

or more blades) helicopters can generate some moment

about the fuselage independent of thrust due to the rotor

hub design with the blade attachment offset from the center

of rotation. However, helicopters with two-bladed teetering

rotors rely entirely on the tilt of the thrust vector for control.

Therefore, low-G conditions can be catastrophic for two-

bladed helicopters.

At lower speeds, such as initiation of a takeoff from hover

or the traditional recovery from vortex ring state, forward

cyclic maneuvers do not cause low G and are safe to perform.

However, an abrupt forward cyclic input or pushover in

a two-bladed helicopter can be dangerous and must be

avoided, particularly at higher speeds. During a pushover

from moderate or high airspeed, as the helicopter noses over,

it enters a low-G condition. Thrust is reduced, and the pilot

has lost control of fuselage attitude but may not immediately

realize it. Tail rotor thrust or other aerodynamic factors will

often induce a roll. The pilot still has control of the rotor disk,

and may instinctively try to correct the roll, but the fuselage

does not respond due to the lack of thrust. If the fuselage is

rolling right, and the pilot puts in left cyclic to correct, the

combination of fuselage angle to the right and rotor disk

angle to the left becomes quite large and may exceed the

clearances built into the rotor hub. This results in the hub

contacting the rotor mast, which is known as mast bumping.

[Figure 11-8] Low-G mast bumping has been the cause of

numerous military and civilian fatal accidents. It was initially

encountered during nap-of-the-earth flying, a very low-

altitude tactical flight technique used by the military where

Figure 11-8. Result of improper corrective action in a low-G

condition.

the aircraft flies following the contours of the geographical

terrain. The accident sequence may be extremely rapid, and

the energy and inertia in the rotor system can sever the mast

or allow rotor blades to strike the tail or other portions of

the helicopter.

Turbulence, especially severe downdrafts, can also cause a

low-G condition and, when combined with high airspeed,

may lead to mast bumping. Typically, helicopters handle

turbulence better than a light airplane due to smaller

surface area of the rotor blades. During flight in turbulence,

momentary excursions in airspeed, altitude, and attitude are

to be expected. Pilots should respond with smooth, gentle

control inputs and avoid overcontrolling. Most importantly,

pilots should slow down, as mast bumping is less likely at

lower airspeeds.

Pilots can avoid mast bumping accidents as follows:

• Avoid abrupt forward cyclic inputs in two-bladed

helicopters. Airplane pilots may find this a difficult

habit to break because pushing the nose down is an

accepted collision avoidance maneuver in an airplane.

Helicopter pilots would accomplish the same rapid

descent by lowering the collective, and airplane pilots

should train to make this instinctual.

• Recognize the weightless feeling associated with the

onset of low G and quickly take corrective action

before the situation becomes critical.

• Recognize that uncommanded right roll for helicopters

with main rotors which rotate counter-clockwise when

viewed from above indicates that loss of control is

imminent, and immediate corrective action must be

taken.

• Recover from a low-G situation by first gently

applying aft cyclic to restore normal G before

attempting to correct any roll.

• If turbulence is expected or encountered, reduce power

and use a slower than normal cruise speed. Turbulence

(where high rotor flapping angles are already present),

and higher airspeeds (where the controls are more

sensitive) both increase susceptibility to low-G

conditions.

• Use a flight simulator to learn to recognize and

experience low G conditions that result in mast

bumping, its correct recovery technique, and the

consequences of using incorrect recovery actions.

Refer to Chapter 14, Simulation.

Multi-bladed rotors may experience a phenomenon similar

to mast bumping known as droop stop pounding if flapping

clearances are exceeded, but because they retain some control

authority at low G, occurrences are less common than for

teetering rotors.

Low Rotor RPM and Rotor Stall

Rotor rpm is a critically important parameter for all helicopter

operations. Just as airplanes will not fly below a certain

airspeed, helicopters will not fly below a certain rotor

rpm. Safe rotor rpm ranges are marked on the helicopter’s

tachometer and specified in the RFM. If the pilot allows the

rotor rpm to fall below the safe operating range, the helicopter

is in a low rpm situation. If the rotor rpm continues to fall,

the rotor will eventually stall.

Rotor stall should not be confused with retreating blade stall,

which occurs at high forward speeds and over a small portion

of the retreating blade tip. Retreating blade stall causes

vibration and control problems, but the rotor is still very

capable of providing sufficient lift to support the weight of

the helicopter. Rotor stall, however, can occur at any airspeed,

and the rotor quickly stops producing enough lift to support

the helicopter, causing it to lose lift and descend rapidly.

Rotor stall is very similar to the stall of an airplane wing

at low airspeeds. The airplane wing relies on airspeed to

produce the required airflow over the wing, whereas the

helicopter relies on rotor rpm. As the airspeed of the airplane

decreases or the speed of the helicopter rotor slows down, the

AOA of the wing/rotor blade must be increased to support

the weight of the aircraft. At a critical angle (about 15°),

the airflow over the wing or the rotor blade will separate

and stall, causing a sudden loss of lift and increase in drag

(refer to Chapter 2, Aerodynamics of Flight). An airplane

pilot recovers from a stall by lowering the nose to reduce the

AOA and adding power to restore normal airflow over the

wing. However, the falling helicopter is experiencing upward

airflow through the rotor disk, and the resulting AOA is so

high that even full down collective will not restore normal

airflow. In the helicopter when the rotor stalls, it does not do

so symmetrically because any forward airspeed will produce

a higher airflow on the advancing side than on the retreating

side. This causes the retreating blade to stall first, and its

weight makes it descend as it moves aft while the advancing

blade is climbing as it goes forward. The resulting low aft

blade and high forward blade become a rapid aft tilting of

the rotor disc sometimes referred to as rotor “blow back” or

“flap back.” As the helicopter begins to descend, the upward

flow of air acting on the bottom surfaces of the tail boom

and any horizontal stabilizers tend to pitch the aircraft nose

down. These two effects, combined with any aft cyclic by

the pilot attempting to keep the aircraft level, allow the rotor

blades to blow back and contact the tail boom, in some cases

actually severing the tail boom. Since the tail rotor is geared

to the main rotor, in many helicopters the loss of main rotor

rpm also causes a significant loss of tail rotor thrust and a

corresponding loss of directional control.

Rotor stalls in helicopters are not recoverable. At low altitude,

rotor stall will result in an accident with significant damage

to the helicopter, and at altitudes above approximately 50

feet the accident will likely be fatal. Consequently, early

recognition of the low rotor rpm condition and proper

recovery technique is imperative.

Low rotor rpm can occur during power-off and power-on

operations. During power-off flight, a low rpm situation

can be caused by the failure to quickly lower the collective

after an engine failure or by raising the collective at too

great a height above ground at the bottom of an autorotation.

However, more common are power-on rotor stall accidents.

These occur when the engine is operating normally but the

pilot demands more power than is available by pulling up

too much on the collective. Known as “overpitching,” this

can easily occur at higher density altitudes where the engine

is already producing its maximum horsepower and the pilot

raises the collective. The corresponding increased AOA of

the blades requires more engine horsepower to maintain the

speed of the blades; however, the engine cannot produce any

additional horsepower, so the speed of the blades decreases.

A similar situation can occur with a heavily loaded helicopter

taking off from a confined area. Other causes of a power-on

low rotor rpm condition include the pilot rolling the throttle

the wrong way in helicopters not equipped with a governor

or a governor failure in helicopters so equipped.

As the rpm decreases, the amount of horsepower the engine

can produce also decreases. Engine horsepower is directly

proportional to its rpm, so a 10 percent loss in rpm due

to overpitching, or one of the other scenarios above, will

result in a 10 percent loss in the engine’s ability to produce

horsepower, making recovery even slower and more difficult

than it would otherwise be. With less power from the engine

and less lift from the decaying rotor rpm, the helicopter will

start to settle. If the pilot raises the collective to stop the

settling, the situation will feed upon itself rapidly leading

to rotor stall.

There are a number of ways the pilot can recognize the low

rotor rpm situation. Visually, the pilot can not only see the

rotor rpm indicator decrease but also the change in torque

will produce a yaw; there will also be a noticeable decrease in

engine noise, and at higher airspeeds or in turns, an increase in

vibration. Many helicopters have a low rpm warning system

that alerts the pilot to the low rotor rpm condition.

To recover from the low rotor rpm condition the pilot must

simultaneously lower the collective, increase throttle if

available and apply aft cyclic to maintain a level attitude.

At higher airspeeds, additional aft cyclic may be used to

help recover lost rpm. Recovery should be accomplished

immediately before investigating the problem and must be

practiced to become a conditioned reflex.

System Malfunctions

By following the manufacturer’s recommendations regarding

operating limits and procedures and periodic maintenance

and inspections, many system and equipment failures can

be eliminated. Certain malfunctions or failures can be traced

to some error on the part of the pilot; therefore, appropriate

flying techniques and use of threat and error management

may help to prevent an emergency

Antitorque System Failure

Antitorque failure usually falls into one of two categories.

One is failure of the power drive portion of the tail rotor disk

resulting in a complete loss of antitorque. The other category

covers mechanical control failures prohibiting the pilot from

changing or controlling tail rotor thrust even though the tail

rotor may still be providing antitorque thrust.

Tail rotor drive system failures include driveshaft failures,

tail rotor gearbox failures, or a complete loss of the tail rotor

itself. In any of these cases, the loss of antitorque normally

results in an immediate spinning of the helicopter’s nose. The

helicopter spins to the right in a counterclockwise rotor disk

and to the left in a clockwise system. This discussion is for a

helicopter with a counterclockwise rotor disk. The severity of

the spin is proportionate to the amount of power being used

and the airspeed. An antitorque failure with a high-power

setting at a low airspeed results in a severe spinning to the

right. At low power settings and high airspeeds, the spin is

less severe. High airspeeds tend to streamline the helicopter

and keep it from spinning.

If a tail rotor failure occurs, power must be reduced in order to

reduce main rotor torque. The techniques differ depending on

whether the helicopter is in flight or in a hover, but ultimately

require an autorotation. If a complete tail rotor failure occurs

while hovering, enter a hovering autorotation by rolling off

the throttle. If the failure occurs in forward flight, enter a

normal autorotation by lowering the collective and rolling

off the throttle. If the helicopter has enough forward airspeed

(close to cruising speed) when the failure occurs, and

depending on the helicopter design, the vertical stabilizer

may provide enough directional control to allow the pilot to

maneuver the helicopter to a more desirable landing sight.

Applying slight cyclic control opposite the direction of yaw

compensates for some of the yaw. This helps in directional

control, but also increases drag. Care must be taken not to

lose too much forward airspeed because the streamlining

effect diminishes as airspeed is reduced. Also, more altitude is

required to accelerate to the correct airspeed if an autorotation

is entered at a low airspeed.

The throttle or power lever on some helicopters is not located

on the collective and readily available. Faced with the loss

of antitorque, the pilot of these models may need to achieve

forward flight and let the vertical fin stop the yawing rotation.

With speed and altitude, the pilot will have the time to set

up for an autorotative approach and set the power control

to idle or off as the situation dictates. At low altitudes, the

pilot may not be able to reduce the power setting and enter

the autorotation before impact.

A mechanical control failure limits or prevents control of tail

rotor thrust and is usually caused by a stuck or broken control

rod or cable. While the tail rotor is still producing antitorque

thrust, it cannot be controlled by the pilot. The amount of

antitorque depends on the position at which the controls jam or

fail. Once again, the techniques differ depending on the amount

of tail rotor thrust, but an autorotation is generally not required.

The specific manufacturer’s procedures should always be

followed. The following is a generalized description of

procedures when more specific procedures are not provided.

Landing—Stuck Left Pedal

A stuck left pedal (high power setting), which might be

experienced during takeoff or climb conditions, results in

the left yaw of the helicopter nose when power is reduced.

Rolling off the throttle and entering an autorotation only

makes matters worse. The landing profile for a stuck left

pedal is best described as a normal-to-steep approach angle to

arrive approximately 2–3 feet landing gear height above the

intended landing area as translational lift is lost. The steeper

angle allows for a lower power setting during the approach

and ensures that the nose remains to the right.

Upon reaching the intended touchdown area and at the

appropriate landing gear height, increase the collective

smoothly to align the nose with the landing direction and

cushion the landing. A small amount of forward cyclic is

helpful to stop the nose from continuing to the right and

directs the aircraft forward and down to the surface. In certain

wind conditions, the nose of the helicopter may remain

to the left with zero to near zero groundspeed above the

intended touchdown point. If the helicopter is not turning,

simply lower the helicopter to the surface. If the nose of the

helicopter is turning to the right and continues beyond the

landing heading, roll the throttle toward flight idle, which is

the amount necessary to stop the turn while landing. Flight

idle is an engine rpm in flight at a given altitude with the

throttle set to the minimum, or idle, position. The flight

idling rpm typically increase with an increase in altitude.

If the helicopter is beginning to turn left, the pilot should

be able to make the landing prior to the turn rate becoming

excessive. However, if the turn rate begins to increase prior

to the landing, simply add power to make a go-around and

return for another landing.

Landing—Stuck Neutral or Right Pedal

The landing profile for a stuck neutral or a stuck right pedal

is a low-power approach terminating with a running or roll-

on landing. The approach profile can best be described as a

shallow to normal approach angle to arrive approximately

2–3 feet landing gear height above the intended landing

area with a minimum airspeed for directional control. The

minimum airspeed is one that keeps the nose from continuing

to yaw to the right.

Upon reaching the intended touchdown area and at the

appropriate landing gear height, reduce the throttle as

necessary to overcome the yaw effect if the nose of the

helicopter remains to the right of the landing heading. The

amount of throttle reduction will vary based on power applied

and winds. The higher the power setting used to cushion the

landing, the more the throttle reduction will be. A coordinated

throttle reduction and increased collective will result in a very

smooth touchdown with some forward groundspeed. If the

nose of the helicopter is to the left of the landing heading,

a slight increase in collective or aft cyclic may be used to

align the nose for touchdown. The decision to land or go

around has to be made prior to any throttle reduction. Using

airspeeds slightly above translational lift may be helpful to

ensure that the nose does not continue yawing to the right. If

a go-around is required, increasing the collective too much or

too rapidly with airspeeds below translational lift may cause

a rapid spinning to the right.

Once the helicopter has landed and is sliding/rolling to a

stop, the heading can be controlled with a combination of

collective, cyclic and throttle. To turn the nose to the right,

raise the collective or apply aft cyclic. The throttle may be

increased as well if it is not in the full open position. To turn

the nose to the left, lower the collective or apply forward

cyclic. The throttle may be decreased as well if it is not

already at flight idle.

Loss of Tail Rotor Effectiveness (LTE)

Loss of tail rotor effectiveness (LTE) or an unanticipated

yaw is defined as an uncommanded, rapid yaw towards the

advancing blade which does not subside of its own accord.

It can result in the loss of the aircraft if left unchecked. It is

very important for pilots to understand that LTE is caused

by an aerodynamic interaction between the main rotor and

tail rotor and not caused from a mechanical failure. Some

helicopter types are more likely to encounter LTE due to the

normal certification thrust produced by having a tail rotor

that, although meeting certification standards, is not always

able to produce the additional thrust demanded by the pilot.

A helicopter is a collection of compromises. Compare the

size of an airplane propeller to that of a tail rotor. Then,

consider the horsepower required to run the propeller. For

example, a Cessna 172P is equipped with a 160-horsepower

(HP) engine. A Robinson R-44 with a comparably sized tail

rotor is rated for a maximum of 245 HP. If you assume the

tail rotor consumes 50 HP, only 195 HP remains to drive

the main rotor. If the pilot were to apply enough collective

to require 215 HP from the engine, and enough left pedal to

require 50 HP for the tail rotor, the resulting engine overload

would lead to one of two outcomes: slow down (reduction

in rpm) or premature failure. In either outcome, antitorque

would be insufficient and total lift might be less than needed

to remain airborne.

Every helicopter design requires some type of antitorque

system to counteract main rotor torque and prevent spinning

once the helicopter lifts off the ground. A helicopter is heavy,

and the powerplant places a high demand on fuel. Weight

penalizes performance, but all helicopters must have an

antitorque system, which adds weight. Therefore, the tail

rotor is certified for normal flight conditions. Environmental

forces can overwhelm any aircraft, rendering the inherently

unstable helicopter especially vulnerable.

As with any aerodynamic condition, it is very important for

pilots to not only to understand the definition of LTE, but

more importantly, how and why it happens, how to avoid

it, and lastly, how to correct it once it is encountered. We

must first understand the capabilities of the aircraft or even

better what it is not capable of doing. For example, if you

were flying a helicopter with a maximum gross weight of

5,200 lb, would you knowingly try to take on fuel, baggage

and passengers causing the weight to be 5,500 lb? A wise

professional pilot should not ever exceed the certificated

maximum gross weight or performance flight weight for any

aircraft. The manuals are written for safety and reliability.

The limitations and emergency procedures are stressed

because lapses in procedures or exceeding limitations can

result in aircraft damage or human fatalities. At the very least,

exceeding limitations will increase the costs of maintenance

and ownership of any aircraft and especially helicopters.

Overloaded parts may fail before their designed lifetime. There

are no extra parts in helicopters. The respect and discipline

pilots exercise in following flight manuals should also be

applied to understanding aerodynamic conditions. If flight

envelopes are exceeded, the end results can be catastrophic.

LTE is an aerodynamic condition and is the result of a control

margin deficiency in the tail rotor. It can affect all single-rotor

helicopters that utilize a tail rotor. The design of main and

tail rotor blades and the tail boom assembly can affect the

characteristics and susceptibility of LTE but will not nullify

the phenomenon entirely. Translational lift is obtained by

any amount of clean air through the main rotor disk. Chapter

2, Aerodynamics of Flight, discusses translational lift with

respect to the main rotor blade, explaining that the more

clean air there is going through the rotor disk, the more

efficient it becomes. The same holds true for the tail rotor.

As the tail rotor works in less turbulent air, it reaches a point

of translational thrust. At this point, the tail rotor becomes

aerodynamically efficient and the improved efficiency

produces more antitorque thrust. The pilot can determine

when the tail rotor has reached translational thrust. As more

antitorque thrust is produced, the nose of the helicopter

yaws to the left (opposite direction of the tail rotor thrust),

forcing the pilot to correct with right pedal application

(actually decreasing the left pedal). This, in turn, decreases

the AOA in the tail rotor blades. Pilots should be aware of the

characteristics of the helicopter they fly and be particularly

aware of the amount of tail rotor pedal typically required for

different flight conditions.

LTE is a condition that occurs when the flow of air through

a tail rotor is altered in some way, by altering the angle or

speed at which the air passes through the rotating blades of

the tail rotor disk. As discussed in the previous paragraph, an

effective tail rotor relies on a stable and relatively undisturbed

Original source PDFPublished from pages 144–154 of the recorded source chapter.
Open source PDF ↗