InfoDotInc / archive systemEstablished online record · rebuilding deliberately
InfoDotInc

Technical documents, historic paths, and source-backed reference material.

Archive / FAA Instrument Flying Handbook / FAA Instrument Flying Handbook: Chapter 9 — Navigation Systems

Chapter 9 — Navigation Systems, Part 6

Chapter 9 — Navigation Systems — Part 6

FAA-H-8083-15B (2012)

OBS

3 33

2I

I5 I2

CRS 180°HDG 330°

LOC1

330°

As you begin procedure turn,

course needle shows

divergence from course

centerline increasing.

While on the procedure turn

inbound the course needle

becomes directional. Start

the turn to final approach

course when the needle

comes alive (needle moves

away from side) and is

moving toward center.

OBS

3 33

33 30

2I

I5I2

CRS 180°HDG 135°

LOC1

135°

OBS

21 15

NAV

GS

Instrument view is from

the pilot’s perspective,

and the movable card is

reset after each turn

OBS N

3 33

242II5

Maintain course with the

needle centered.

CRS 180°HDG 180°

LOC1

180° D

CRS 180°HDG 350°

LOC1

350°

OBS

3 33

2I I5

As you fly northbound of the

instrument runway (in this case

Localizer 18), with the radio

tuned to the Localizer

frequency (and identified), the

course needle is not directional.

Correct left to center the course

needle.

FAF

Localizer inbound

course is 180°

As you fly a missed approach

along the back course, the

needle, indicating “fly left” is

directional.

In this case fly left to get on

course.

OBS

3 33

242II5

CRS 180°HDG 180°

LOC1

180°

Figure 9-38. Localizer course indications. To follow indications displayed in the aircraft, start from A and proceed through E.

OBS

FR

TO

E S

15 12

NAV 1

Figure 7-35. Glide-slope receiver indications and aircraft displacement.

Outer Marker Beacons

Middle Marker Beacons

OBS

FR

TO

E S

15 12

NAV 1

Figure 9-39. A GS receiver indication and aircraft displacement. An analog system is on the left and the same indication on the Garmin

PFD on the right.

Some marker beacon receivers, to decrease weight and cost,

are designed without their own power supply. These units

utilize a power source from another radio in the avionics

stack, often the ADF. In some aircraft, this requires the ADF

to be turned on in order for the marker beacon receiver to

function, yet no warning placard is required. Another source

of trouble may be the “HIGH/LOW/OFF” three-position

switch, which both activates the receiver and selects receiver

sensitivity. Usually, the “test” feature only tests to see if

the light bulbs in the marker beacon lights are working.

Therefore, in some installations, there is no functional way

for the pilot to ascertain the marker beacon receiver is actually

on except to fly over a marker beacon transmitter and see if

a signal is received and indicated (e.g., audibly, and visually

via marker beacon lights).

Operational Errors

1. Failure to understand the fundamentals of ILS ground

equipment, particularly the differences in course

dimensions. Since the VOR receiver is used on the

localizer course, the assumption is sometimes made

that interception and tracking techniques are identical

when tracking localizer courses and VOR radials.

Remember that the CDI sensing is sharper and faster

on the localizer course.

2. Disorientation during transition to the ILS due to poor

planning and reliance on one receiver instead of on all

available airborne equipment. Use all the assistance

available; a single receiver may fail.

3. Disorientation on the localizer course, due to the first

error noted above.

4. Incorrect localizer interception angles. A large

interception angle usually results in overshooting

and possible disorientation. When intercepting,

if possible, turn to the localizer course heading

immediately upon the first indication of needle

movement. An ADF receiver is an excellent aid to

orient you during an ILS approach if there is a locator

or NDB on the inbound course.

5. Chasing the CDI and glidepath needles, especially

when you have not sufficiently studied the approach

before the flight.

Simplified Directional Facility (SDF)

The simplified directional facility (SDF) provides a final

approach course similar to the ILS localizer. The SDF course

may or may not be aligned with the runway and the course

may be wider than a standard ILS localizer, resulting in less

Figure 7-36. MLS coverage volumes, 3-D representation

40°L 40°R

20,000’

Figure 9-40. MLS coverage volumes, 3-D representation.

precision. Usable off-course indications are limited to 35°

either side of the course centerline. Instrument indications

in the area between 35° and 90° from the course centerline

are not controlled and should be disregarded.

The SDF must provide signals sufficient to allow satisfactory

operation of a typical aircraft installation within a sector

which extends from the center of the SDF antenna system

to distances of 18 NM covering a sector 10° either side of

centerline up to an angle 7° above the horizontal. The angle

of convergence of the final approach course and the extended

runway centerline must not exceed 30°. Pilots should note

this angle since the approach course originates at the antenna

site, and an approach continued beyond the runway threshold

would lead the aircraft to the SDF offset position rather than

along the runway centerline.

The course width of the SDF signal emitted from the

transmitter is fixed at either 6° or 12°, as necessary, to provide

maximum flyability and optimum approach course quality.

A three-letter identifier is transmitted in code on the SDF

frequency; there is no letter “I” (two dots) transmitted before

the station identifier, as there is with the LOC. For example,

the identifier for Lebanon, Missouri, SDF is LBO.

Localizer Type Directional Aid (LDA)

The localizer type directional aid (LDA) is of comparable

utility and accuracy to a localizer but is not part of a

complete ILS. The LDA course width is between 3° and 6°

and thus provides a more precise approach course than an

SDF installation. Some LDAs are equipped with a GS. The

LDA course is not aligned with the runway, but straight-in

minimums may be published where the angle between the

runway centerline and the LDA course does not exceed 30°. If

this angle exceeds 30°, only circling minimums are published.

The identifier is three letters preceded by “I” transmitted in

code on the LDA frequency. For example, the identifier for

Van Nuys, California, LDA is I-BUR.

Microwave Landing System (MLS)

The microwave landing system (MLS) provides precision

navigation guidance for exact alignment and descent of aircraft

on approach to a runway. It provides azimuth, elevation, and

distance. Both lateral and vertical guidance may be displayed

on conventional course deviation indicators or incorporated

into multipurpose flight deck displays. Range information

can be displayed by conventional DME indicators and also

incorporated into multipurpose displays. [Figure 9-40]

The system may be divided into five functions, which are

approach azimuth, back azimuth, approach elevation, range;

and data communications. The standard configuration of

MLS ground equipment includes an azimuth station to

perform functions as indicated above. In addition to providing

azimuth navigation guidance, the station transmits basic data,

which consists of information associated directly with the

operation of the landing system, as well as advisory data on

the performance of the ground equipment.

Approach Azimuth Guidance

The azimuth station transmits MLS angle and data on one

of 200 channels within the frequency range of 5031 to 5091

MHz. The equipment is normally located about 1,000 feet

beyond the stop end of the runway, but there is considerable

flexibility in selecting sites. For example, for heliport

operations the azimuth transmitter can be collocated with

the elevation transmitter. The azimuth coverage extends

laterally at least 40° on either side of the runway centerline

in a standard configuration, in elevation up to an angle of 15°

and to at least 20,000 feet, and in range to at least 20 NM.

MLS requires separate airborne equipment to receive and

process the signals from what is normally installed in general

aviation aircraft today. It has data communications capability,

and can provide audible information about the condition

of the transmitting system and other pertinent data such as

weather, runway status, etc. The MLS transmits an audible

identifier consisting of four letters beginning with the letter

M, in Morse code at a rate of at least six per minute. The

MLS system monitors itself and transmits ground-to-air data

messages about the system’s operational condition. During

periods of routine or emergency maintenance, the coded

identification is missing from the transmissions. At this time

there are only a few systems installed.

Required Navigation Performance

RNP is a navigation system that provides a specified level

of accuracy defined by a lateral area of confined airspace in

which an RNP-certified aircraft operates. The continuing

growth of aviation places increasing demands on airspace

capacity and emphasizes the need for the best use of the

available airspace. These factors, along with the accuracy of

modern aviation navigation systems and the requirement for

increased operational efficiency in terms of direct routings

and track-keeping accuracy, have resulted in the concept

of required navigation performance—a statement of the

navigation performance accuracy necessary for operation

within a defined airspace. RNP can include both performance

and functional requirements and is indicated by the RNP type.

These standards are intended for designers, manufacturers,

and installers of avionics equipment, as well as service

providers and users of these systems for global operations.

The minimum aviation system performance specification

(MASPS) provides guidance for the development of airspace

and operational procedures needed to obtain the benefits of

improved navigation capability. [Figure 9-41]

The RNP type defines the total system error (TSE) that

is allowed in lateral and longitudinal dimensions within

a particular airspace. The TSE, which takes account of

navigation system errors (NSE), computation errors, display

errors and flight technical errors (FTE), must not exceed the

specified RNP value for 95 percent of the flight time on any

part of any single flight. RNP combines the accuracy standards

laid out in the ICAO Manual (Doc 9613) with specific accuracy

requirements, as well as functional and performance standards,

for the RNAV system to realize a system that can meet future

air traffic management requirements. The functional criteria

for RNP address the need for the flightpaths of participating

aircraft to be both predictable and repeatable to the declared

levels of accuracy. More information on RNP is contained in

subsequent chapters.

The term RNP is also applied as a descriptor for airspace,

routes, and procedures (including departures, arrivals,

and IAPs). The descriptor can apply to a unique approach

procedure or to a large region of airspace. RNP applies to

navigation performance within a designated airspace and

includes the capability of both the available infrastructure

(navigation aids) and the aircraft.

RNP type is used to specify navigation requirements for the

airspace. The following are ICAO RNP Types: RNP-1.0,

RNP-4.0, RNP-5.0, and RNP-10.0. The required performance

is obtained through a combination of aircraft capability and

the level of service provided by the corresponding navigation

infrastructure. From a broad perspective:

Aircraft Capability + Level of Service = Access

In this context, aircraft capability refers to the airworthiness

certification and operational approval elements (including

avionics, maintenance, database, human factors, pilot

procedures, training, and other issues). The level of service

element refers to the NAS infrastructure, including published

routes, signal-in-space performance and availability, and air

traffic management. When considered collectively, these

elements result in providing access. Access provides the

desired benefit (airspace, procedures, routes of flight, etc.).

RNP levels are actual distances from the centerline of the

flightpath, which must be maintained for aircraft and obstacle

separation. Although additional FAA-recognized RNP

levels may be used for specific operations, the United States

currently supports three standard RNP levels:

• RNP 0.3 – Approach

• RNP 1.0 – Departure, Terminal

• RNP 2.0 – En route

RNP 0.3 represents a distance of 0.3 NM either side of a

specified flightpath centerline. The specific performance that

is required on the final approach segment of an instrument

approach is an example of this RNP level. At the present

time, a 0.3 RNP level is the lowest level used in normal

RNAV operations. Specific airlines, using special procedures,

are approved to use RNP levels lower than RNP 0.3, but

those levels are used only in accordance with their approved

operations specifications (OpsSpecs). For aircraft equipment to

qualify for a specific RNP type, it must maintain navigational

accuracy at least 95 percent of the total flight time.

Flight Management Systems (FMS)

A flight management system (FMS) is not a navigation

system in itself. Rather, it is a system that automates the

tasks of managing the onboard navigation systems. FMS may

perform other onboard management tasks, but this discussion

is limited to its navigation function.

FMS is an interface between flight crews and flightdeck

systems. FMS can be thought of as a computer with a large

database of airport and NAVAID locations and associated

data, aircraft performance data, airways, intersections,

DPs, and STARs. FMS also has the ability to accept and

store numerous user-defined WPs, flight routes consisting

of departures, WPs, arrivals, approaches, alternates, etc.

FMS can quickly define a desired route from the aircraft’s

current position to any point in the world, perform flight

plan computations, and display the total picture of the flight

route to the crew.

EN ROUTE

TERMINAL

FINAL APPROACH

2.0 NM

2.0 NM

1.0 NM

1.0 NM

0.3 NM

0.3 NM

APPROACH TERMINAL ENROUTE DEPARTURE

RNP 1.0RNP 2.0RNP 1.0RNP 0.3

Figure 9-41. Required navigation performance.

FMS also has the capability of controlling (selecting) VOR,

DME, and LOC NAVAIDs, and then receiving navigational

data from them. INS, LORAN, and GPS navigational data

may also be accepted by the FMS computer. The FMS may

act as the input/output device for the onboard navigation

systems, so that it becomes the “go-between” for the crew

and the navigation systems.

The Universal UNS-1 The Avidyne The Garmin system

Figure 9-42. Typical display and control unit(s) in general aviation. The Universal UNS-1 (left) controls and integrates all other systems. The

Avidyne (center) and Garmin systems (right) illustrate and are typical of completely integrated systems. Although the Universal CDU is not

typically found on smaller general aviation aircraft, the difference in capabilities of the CDUs and stand-alone sytems is diminishing each year.

Function of FMS

At startup, the crew programs the aircraft location, departure

runway, DP (if applicable), WPs defining the route, approach

procedure, approach to be used, and routing to alternate. This

may be entered manually, be in the form of a stored flight

plan, or be a flight plan developed in another computer and

transferred by disk or electronically to the FMS computer.

The crew enters this basic information in the control/display

unit (CDU). [Figure 9-42]

Once airborne, the FMS computer channels the appropriate

NAVAIDs and takes radial/distance information or

channels two NAVAIDs, taking the more accurate distance

information. FMS then indicates position, track, desired

heading, groundspeed, and position relative to desired track.

Position information from the FMS updates the INS. In more

sophisticated aircraft, the FMS provides inputs to the HSI,

RMI, glass flight deck navigation displays, head-up display

(HUD), autopilot, and autothrottle systems.

Head-Up Display (HUD)

The HUD is a display system that provides a projection of

navigation and air data (airspeed in relation to approach

reference speed, altitude, left/right and up/down GS) on a

transparent screen between the pilot and the windshield.

Other information may be displayed, including a runway

target in relation to the nose of the aircraft. This allows the

pilot to see the information necessary to make the approach

while also being able to see out the windshield, which

diminishes the need to shift between looking at the panel to

looking outside. Virtually any information desired can be

displayed on the HUD if it is available in the aircraft’s flight

computer and if the display is user definable. [Figure 9-43]

Radar Navigation (Ground-Based)

Radar works by transmitting a pulse of RF energy in a specific

direction. The return of the echo or bounce of that pulse from

a target is precisely timed. From this, the distance traveled

by the pulse and its echo is determined and displayed on a

radar screen in such a manner that the distance and bearing to

this target can be instantly determined. The radar transmitter

must be capable of delivering extremely high power levels

toward the airspace under surveillance, and the associated

radar receiver must be able to detect extremely small signal

levels of the returning echoes.

The radar display system provides the controller with a map-

like presentation upon which appear all the radar echoes

of aircraft within detection range of the radar facility. By

means of electronically-generated range marks and azimuth-

indicating devices, the controller can locate each radar target

with respect to the radar facility, or can locate one radar target

with respect to another.

Another device, a video-mapping unit, generates an actual

airway or airport map and presents it on the radar display

equipment. Using the video-mapping feature, the air traffic

controller not only can view the aircraft targets, but can see

these targets in relation to runways, navigation aids, and

hazardous ground obstructions in the area. Therefore, radar

becomes a NAVAID, as well as the most significant means

of traffic separation.

In a display presenting perhaps a dozen or more targets,

a primary surveillance radar system cannot identify one

specific radar target, and it may have difficulty “seeing” a

small target at considerable distance—especially if there is

a rain shower or thunderstorm between the radar site and

the aircraft. This problem is solved with the Air Traffic

Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS), sometimes

called secondary surveillance radar (SSR), which utilizes

a transponder in the aircraft. The ground equipment is an

interrogating unit, in which the beacon antenna is mounted

so it rotates with the surveillance antenna. The interrogating

Figure 9-43. Example of a head-up display (top) and a head-down

display (bottom). The head-up display presents information in front of

the pilot along his/her normal field of view while a head-down display

may present information beyond the normal head-up field of view.

unit transmits a coded pulse sequence that actuates the aircraft

transponder. The transponder answers the coded sequence

by transmitting a preselected coded sequence back to the

ground equipment, providing a strong return signal and

positive aircraft identification, as well as other special data

such as aircraft altitude.

Functions of Radar Navigation

The radar systems used by ATC are air route surveillance

radar (ARSR), airport surveillance radar (ASR), and

precision approach radar (PAR) and airport surface detection

equipment (ASDE). Surveillance radars scan through 360°

of azimuth and present target information on a radar display

located in a tower or center. This information is used

independently or in conjunction with other navigational aids

in the control of air traffic.

ARSR is a long-range radar system designed primarily to

cover large areas and provide a display of aircraft while en

route between terminal areas. The ARSR enables air route

traffic control center (ARTCC) controllers to provide radar

service when the aircraft are within the ARSR coverage.

In some instances, ARSR may enable ARTCC to provide

terminal radar services similar to but usually more limited

than those provided by a radar approach control.

ASR is designed to provide relatively short-range coverage

in the general vicinity of an airport and to serve as an

expeditious means of handling terminal area traffic through

observation of precise aircraft locations on a radarscope.

Nonprecision instrument approaches are available at airports

that have an approved surveillance radar approach procedure.

ASR provides radar vectors to the final approach course and

then azimuth information to the pilot during the approach.

In addition to range (distance) from the runway, the pilot

is advised of MDA, when to begin descent, and when the

aircraft is at the MDA. If requested, recommended altitudes

are furnished each mile while on final.

PAR is designed to be used as a landing aid displaying range,

azimuth, and elevation information rather than as an aid for

sequencing and spacing aircraft. PAR equipment may be

used as a primary landing aid, or it may be used to monitor

other types of approaches. Two antennas are used in the PAR

array: one scanning a vertical plane and the other scanning

horizontally. Since the range is limited to 10 miles, azimuth

to 20°, and elevation to 7°, only the final approach area is

covered. The controller’s scope is divided into two parts. The

upper half presents altitude and distance information, and the

lower half presents azimuth and distance.

PAR is a system in which a controller provides highly

accurate navigational guidance in azimuth and elevation

to a pilot. Pilots are given headings to fly to direct them to

and keep their aircraft aligned with the extended centerline

of the landing runway. They are told to anticipate glidepath

interception approximately 10–30 seconds before it occurs

and when to start descent. The published decision height (DH)

is given only if the pilot requests it. If the aircraft is observed

to deviate above or below the glidepath, the pilot is given

the relative amount of deviation by use of terms “slightly” or

“well” and is expected to adjust the aircraft’s rate of descent/

ascent to return to the glidepath. Trend information is also

issued with respect to the elevation of the aircraft and may

be modified by the terms “rapidly” and “slowly” (e.g., “well

above glidepath, coming down rapidly”).

Range from touchdown is given at least once each mile. If

an aircraft is observed by the controller to proceed outside

of specified safety zone limits in azimuth and/or elevation

and continue to operate outside these prescribed limits, the

pilot will be directed to execute a missed approach or to fly a

specified course unless the pilot has the runway environment

(runway, approach lights, etc.) in sight. Navigational

guidance in azimuth and elevation is provided to the pilot

until the aircraft reaches the published decision altitude (DA)/

DH. Advisory course and glidepath information is furnished

by the controller until the aircraft passes over the landing

threshold, at which point the pilot is advised of any deviation

from the runway centerline. Radar service is automatically

terminated upon completion of the approach.

Airport Surface Detection Equipment

Radar equipment is specifically designed to detect all

principal features on the surface of an airport, including

aircraft and vehicular traffic, and to present the entire image

on a radar indicator console in the control tower. It is used

to augment visual observation by tower personnel of aircraft

and/or vehicular movements on runways and taxiways.

Radar Limitations

1. It is very important for the aviation community to

recognize the fact that there are limitations to radar

service and that ATC may not always be able to issue

traffic advisories concerning aircraft which are not

under ATC control and cannot be seen on radar.

2. The characteristics of radio waves are such that they

normally travel in a continuous straight line unless

they are “bent” by abnormal atmospheric phenomena

such as temperature inversions; reflected or attenuated

by dense objects such as heavy clouds, precipitation,

ground obstacles, mountains, etc.; or screened by high

terrain features.

3. Primary radar energy that strikes dense objects is

reflected and displayed on the operator’s scope,

thereby blocking out aircraft at the same range and

greatly weakening or completely eliminating the

display of targets at a greater range.

4. Relatively low altitude aircraft are not seen if they are

screened by mountains or are below the radar beam

due to curvature of the Earth.

5. The amount of reflective surface of an aircraft

determines the size of the radar return. Therefore,

a small light airplane or a sleek jet fighter is more

difficult to see on primary radar than a large

commercial jet or military bomber.

6. All ARTCC radar in the conterminous United States

and many ASR have the capability to interrogate Mode

C and display altitude information to the controller

from appropriately-equipped aircraft. However,

a number of ASR do not have Mode C display

capability; therefore, altitude information must be

obtained from the pilot.

Original source PDFPublished from pages 284–291 of the recorded source chapter.
Open source PDF ↗