InfoDotInc / archive systemEstablished online record · rebuilding deliberately
InfoDotInc

Technical documents, historic paths, and source-backed reference material.

Archive / FAA Instrument Flying Handbook / FAA Instrument Flying Handbook: Chapter 1 — The National Airspace System

Chapter 1 — The National Airspace System, Part 4

Chapter 1 — The National Airspace System — Part 4

FAA-H-8083-15B (2012)

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

Figure 1-19. Descent rate table.

SE-3, 16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

SE-3, 16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

PILOT BRIEFING

AND

PROCEDURE NOTES

AIRPORT

DIAGRAM

PLAN VIEW PROFILE MINIMUMS

RVR

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

Figure 1-20. Terms/landing minima data.

All minima step in parentheses not applicable to Civil

Pilots. Military Pilots refer to appropriate regulations.

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

an altitude number, hyphen, and a whole or fractional

number appear; for example, 530-1, which indicates “530

feet MSL” and 1 statute mile visibility. This is the descent

minimum for the approach. The RVR value is separated

from the minimum altitude with a slash, such as “1065/24,”

which indicates 1,065 feet MSL and an RVR of 2,400 feet.

If RVR is prescribed for the procedure, but not available, a

conversion table is used to provide the equivalent visibility

in this case, of ½ statute mile visibility. [Figure 1-20] The

conversion table is also available in the TPP.

When an alternate airport is required, standard IFR alternate

minimums apply. For aircraft other than helicopters, precision

approach procedures require a 600-feet ceiling and 2 statute

miles visibility; nonprecision approaches require an 800-feet

ceiling and 2 statute miles visibility. Helicopter alternate

minimums are a ceiling that is 200 feet above the minimum

for the approach to be flown and visibility of at least 1

statute mile, but not less than the minimum visibility for the

approach to be flown. When a black triangle with a white “A”

appears in the notes section of the pilot briefing, it indicates

non-standard IFR alternate minimums exist for the airport.

If an “NA” appears after the “A” ( ), then alternate

minimums are not authorized. This information is found in

the beginning of the TPP.

In addition to the COPTER approaches, instrument-

equipped helicopters may fly standard approach procedures.

The required visibility minimum may be reduced to one-half

the published visibility minimum for category A aircraft,

but in no case may it be reduced to less than ¼ mile or

1,200 feet RVR.

Two terms are specific to helicopters. Height above landing

(HAL) means height above a designated helicopter landing

area used for helicopter IAPs. “ Point in space approach”

refers to a helicopter IAP to a MAP more than 2,600 feet

from an associated helicopter landing area.

Airport Sketch /Airport Diagram

Prior to all flights, pilots should take the time and study the

airport layout for all of the airports that they intend to land,

including those that may be used as an alternate. During

the flight planning phase, study the taxi procedures for the

departure airport and landing procedures for the arrival

airport. The expected taxi route should be checked against

the airport diagram or taxi chart, and special attention should

be given to the unique or complex intersections along the taxi

route. Pilots should identify critical times and locations on the

taxi route (e.g., transitioning through complex intersections,

crossing intervening runways, entering and lining up on the

runway for takeoff, and approaching and lining up on the

runway for landing).

By knowing the layout of the airport and their particular

procedures, pilots are able to anticipate, understand, and

safely execute all ATC directives and procedures. A major

contributor to runway incursions is pilots not knowing

the airport layout and procedures. This lack of situational

awareness causes unnecessary accidents that can be avoided

by proper flight planning. The FAA believes that following

the aircraft’s progress on the airport diagram to be sure that

the instructions received from ATC are being followed is

one of the key procedures in reducing runway incursions. To

do this, pilots must take the time prior to the flight to study

all procedures so that they are not trying to learn about the

airport while they are receiving ATC instructions.

The airport sketch, located on the bottom of the chart, includes

many helpful features. IAPs for some of the larger airports

devote an entire page to an airport diagram. Airport sketch

information concerning runway orientation, lighting, final

approach bearings, airport beacon, and obstacles all serve to

guide the pilot in the final phases of flight. See Figure 1-21 for

a legend of airport diagram/airport sketch features (see also

Figure 1-10 for an example of an airport diagram).

The airport elevation is indicated in a separate box at the

top left of the airport sketch. The touchdown zone elevation

(TDZE), which is the highest elevation within the first 3,000

feet of the runway, is designated at the approach end of the

procedure’s runway.

Beneath the airport sketch is a time and speed table when

applicable. The table provides the distance and the amount

of time required to transit the distance from the FAF to the

MAP for selected groundspeeds.

The approach lighting systems and the visual approach lights

are depicted on the airport sketch. White on black symbols

( ) are used for identifying pilot-controlled lighting (PCL).

Runway lighting aids are also noted (e.g., REIL, HIRL), as is

the runway centerline lighting (RCL). [Figure 1-22]

The airport diagram shows the paved runway configuration

in solid black, while the taxiways and aprons are shaded

gray. Other runway environment features are shown, such

as the runway identification, dimensions, magnetic heading,

displaced threshold, arresting gear, usable length, and slope.

Inoperative Components

Certain procedures can be flown with inoperative components.

According to the Inoperative Components Table, for

example, an instrument landing system (ILS) approach

with a malfunctioning Medium Intensity Approach Lighting

System with Runway Alignment Indicator Lights (MALSR =

MALS with RAIL) can be flown if the minimum visibility is

INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES (CHARTS)

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

Figure 1-21. Airport legend and diagram.

SE-4, 16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

SE-4, 16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

PILOT BRIEFING

AND

PROCEDURE NOTES

AIRPORT

DIAGRAM

PLAN VIEW PROFILE MINIMUMS

INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES (CHARTS)

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

Figure 1-22. Approach lighting legend.

INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES (CHARTS)

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

increased by ¼ mile. [Figure 1-23] A note in this section

might read, “Inoperative Table does not apply to ALS or

HIRL Runway 13L.”

RNAV Instrument Approach Charts

To avoid unnecessary duplication and proliferation of

approach charts, approach minimums for unaugmented

GPS, Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), Local

Area Augmentation System (LAAS) are published on

the same approach chart as lateral navigation/vertical

navigation (LNAV/VNAV). Other types of equipment

may be authorized to conduct the approach based on the

minima notes in the front of the TPP approach chart books.

Approach charts titled “RNAV RWY XX” may be used

by aircraft with navigation systems that meet the required

navigational performance (RNP) values for each segment

of the approach. [Figure 1-24]

The chart may contain as many as four lines of approach

minimums: global landing system (GLS), WAAS and LAAS,

LNAV/VNAV, LNAV, and circling. LNAV/VNAV is an

instrument approach with lateral and vertical guidance with

integrity limits similar to barometric vertical navigation

(BARO VNAV).

RNAV procedures that incorporate a final approach stepdown

fix may be published without vertical navigation on a separate

chart also titled RNAV. During a transition period when GPS

procedures are undergoing revision to a new title, both RNAV

and GPS approach charts and formats are published. ATC

clearance for the RNAV procedure authorizes a properly

certificated pilot to utilize any landing minimums for which

the aircraft is certified.

Chart terminology changes slightly to support the new

procedure types:

1. DA replaces the term DH. DA conforms to the

international convention where altitudes relate to

MSL and heights relate to AGL. DA will eventually

be published for other types of IAPs with vertical

guidance, as well. DA indicates to the pilot that the

published descent profile is flown to the DA (MSL),

where a missed approach is initiated if visual references

for landing are not established. Obstacle clearance is

provided to allow a momentary descent below DA

while transitioning from the final approach to the

missed approach. The aircraft is expected to follow

the missed approach instructions while continuing

along the published final approach course to at least

the published runway threshold waypoint or MAP (if

not at the threshold) before executing any turns.

2. MDA continues to be used only for the LNAV and

circling procedures.

3. TCH has been traditionally used in precision

approaches as the height of the GS above threshold.

With publication of LNAV/VNAV minimums and

RNAV descent angles, including graphically depicted

descent profiles, TCH also applies to the height of the

“descent angle,” or glidepath, at the threshold. Unless

otherwise required for larger type aircraft that may be

using the IAP, the typical TCH is 30 to 50 feet.

The minima format changes slightly:

1. Each line of minima on the RNAV IAP is titled to

reflect the RNAV system applicable (e.g., LPV, LNAV/

VNAV, and LNAV). Circling minima is also provided.

2. The minima title box also indicates the nature of the

minimum altitude for the IAP. For example: DA is

published next to the minima line title for minimums

supporting vertical guidance, and MDA is published

where the minima line supports only lateral guidance.

During an approach where an MDA is used, descent

below MDA is not authorized.

3. Where two or more systems share the same minima,

each line of minima is displayed separately.

For more information concerning government charts, the

AeroNav Products can be contacted by telephone or via their

internet address at:

National Aeronautical Navigation Products (AeroNav Products)

Telephone 800-626-3677

www.aeronav.faa.gov

Figure 1-23. IAP inoperative components table.

SW-1, 16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

SW-1, 16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

PILOT BRIEFING

AND

PROCEDURE NOTES

AIRPORT

DIAGRAM

PLAN VIEW PROFILE MINIMUMS

Field elevation

PAPI

Approach lights

Touchdown

zone elevation

Figure 1-24. RNAV instrument approach charts.

SE-4, 16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

SE-4, 16 DEC 2010 to 13 JAN 2011

PILOT BRIEFING

AND

PROCEDURE NOTES

AIRPORT

DIAGRAM

PLAN VIEW PROFILE MINI-

MUMS

Runway lights

pilot controlled

VASI

Alternate minimums

not authorized

Original source PDFPublished from pages 44–51 of the recorded source chapter.
Open source PDF ↗