InfoDotInc / archive systemEstablished online record · rebuilding deliberately
InfoDotInc

Technical documents, historic paths, and source-backed reference material.

Archive / FAA Instrument Procedures Handbook / FAA Instrument Procedures Handbook: Chapter 1 — Departure Procedures

Chapter 1 — Departure Procedures — Part 1

Chapter 1 — Departure Procedures — Part 1

FAA-H-8083-16B (2017)

Chapter 1

Departure Procedures

Introduction

Thousands of instrument flight rules (IFR) takeoffs and

departures occur daily in the National Airspace System

(NAS). In order to accommodate this volume of IFR traffic, air

traffic control (ATC) must rely on pilots to use charted airport

sketches and diagrams, as well as departure procedures

(DPs) that include both standard instrument departures

(SIDs) and obstacle departure procedures (ODPs). While

many charted (and uncharted) departures are based on

radar vectors, the bulk of IFR departures in the NAS require

pilots to navigate out of the terminal environment to the

en route phase.

IFR takeoffs and departures are fast-paced phases of

flight, and pilots often are overloaded with critical flight

information. While preparing for takeoff, pilots are busy

requesting and receiving clearances, preparing their aircraft

for departure, and taxiing to the active runway. During IFR

conditions, they are doing this with minimal visibility, and

they may be without constant radio communication if flying

out of a non-towered airport. Historically, takeoff minimums

for commercial operations have been successively reduced

through a combination of improved signage, runway

markings and lighting aids, and concentrated pilot

training and qualifications. Today at major terminals, some

commercial operators with appropriate equipment, pilot

qualifications, and approved Operations Specifications

(OpSpecs) may takeoff with visibility as low as 300 feet

runway visual range (RVR). One of the consequences of

takeoffs with reduced visibility is that pilots are challenged

in maintaining situational awareness during taxi operations.

Surface Movement Safety

One of the biggest safety concerns in aviation is the surface

movement accident. As a direct result, the FAA has rapidly

expanded the information available to pilots, including

the addition of taxiway and runway information in FAA

publications, particularly the IFR U.S. Terminal Procedures

Publication (TPP) booklets and the Chart Supplement (CS)

volumes. The FAA has also implemented new procedures

and created educational and awareness programs for

pilots, ATC, and ground operators. By focusing resources

to attack this problem head on, the FAA hopes to reduce

and eventually eliminate surface movement accidents.

Airport Sketches and Diagrams

Airport sketches and diagrams provide pilots of all levels

with graphical depictions of the airport layout. Aeronautical

Information Services, formerly known as Aeronautical

Products (AeroNav), provide an airport sketch on the lower

left or right portion of every instrument approach chart.

[Figure 1-1] This sketch depicts the runways, their length,

width and slope, the touchdown zone elevation, the lighting

system installed on the end of the runway, and taxiways.

Graphical depictions of NOTAMS are also available for

selected airports as well as for temporary flight restriction

(TFRs) areas on the defense internet NOTAM service (DINS)

website.

For select airports, typically those with heavy traffic or

complex runway layouts, Aeronautical Information Services

also prints an airport diagram. The diagram is located in

the IFR TPP booklet following the instrument approach

chart for a particular airport. It is a full page depiction of

the airport that includes the same features of the airport

sketch plus additional details, such as taxiway identifiers,

Figure 1-1. Airport diagram included on the Oshkosh, Wisconsin

VOR RWY 9 Approach Chart as depicted in the IFR TPP .

NOT FOR NAVIGATION

Runway numbers

Runway slope

Runway length and width

airport latitude and longitude, and building identification.

The airport diagrams are also available in the Airport/Facility

Directory section of the Chart Supplement (CS) and on the

Aeronautical Information Services' website, located at

www.aeronav.faa.gov. [Figure 1-2]

Chart Supplements (CS)

In recent years, the former Airport/Facility Directory (A/

FD) booklet was incorporated as a section in the Chart

Supplement (CS). [Figure 2-14] The Chart Supplement

(CS) is published by Aeronautical Information Services in

regional booklets and online at: [https://www.faa.gov/

air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/]

The online version is known as the digital Chart Supplement

(d-CS). The d-CS and the CS are identical and provide

textual and graphic information about all airports, both

Visual Flight Rules (VFR) and IFR. The Airport/Facility

Directory (A/FD) section of the CS includes runway length

EC-3, 29 JUL 2010 to 26 AUG 2010

EC-3, 29 JUL 2010 to 26 AUG 2010

NOT FOR NAVIGATION

Longitude and latitude

Airport name and locationOn-airport buildings

Taxiway designations

Precise runway direction

Runway slope

Figure 1-2. Airport diagram of Oshkosh, Wisconsin as depicted in

the A/FD section of the CS.

and width, runway surface, load bearing capacity, runway

slope, runway declared distances, airport services, and

hazards, such as birds and reduced visibility. [Figure 1-3]

Sketches of airports also are being added to aid VFR pilots in

surface movement activities. In support of the FAA Runway

Incursion Program, full page airport diagrams and “Hot

Spot” locations are included in the A/FD section of the CS.

These charts are the same as those published in the IFR

TPP and are printed for airports with complex runway or

taxiway layouts.

Surface Movement Guidance Control System

(SMGCS)

The Surface Movement Guidance Control System

(SMGCS) was developed to facilitate the safe movement

of aircraft and vehicles at airports where scheduled

air carriers were conducting authorized operations.

Advisory Circular 120-57 was developed in 1992. In 2012,

FAA Order 8000.94, Procedures for Establishing Airport

Low-Visibility Operations and Approval of Low-Visibility

Operations/Surface Movement Guidance and Control

System Operations, was published to provide procedures

for establishing Airport Low-Visibility Operations (LVO)

and Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems. It

established the necessary FAA headquarters and operating

services, roles, responsibilities, and activities for operations

at 14 CFR Part 139 airports using RVRs of less than 1,200

feet for each runway. The order applies to all users of

the system at all levels who are formally listed. The FAA

requires the commissioning of an “FAA approved LVO/

SMGCS Operation” for all new Category III ILS supported

runways. Since there are no regulatory takeoff minimums

for 14 CFR Part 91 operations, the information provided by

FAA AC 120-57 and FAA Order 8000.94 must be understood

so that the general aviation pilot can understand LVO and

SMGCS during day or night.

The SMGCS low visibility taxi plan includes the enhancement

of taxiway and runway signs, markings, and lighting,

as well as the creation of SMGCS visual aid diagrams.

[Figure 1-4] The plan also clearly identifies taxi routes

and their supporting facilities and equipment. Airport

enhancements that are part of the SMGCS program include,

but are not limited to:

• Controllable Stop bars lights—these consist of a row

of red, unidirectional, in-pavement lights that can be

controlled by ATC. They provide interactions with

and aircraft that prevent runway incursions during

takeoff operations. These are required for operations

at less than 500 ft RVR.

• Non-Controllable Stop bars lights—these are red,

unidirectinoal lights place at intersections where a

restriction to movement is required. They must be

in continuous operation at less than 500 ft RVR.

• Taxiway centerline lead-on lights—guide ground

traffic under low visibility conditions and at night.

These lights consist of alternating green/yellow in-

pavement lights.

• Runway guard lights—either elevated or in-

pavement, may be installed at all taxiways that

provide access to an active runway. They consist

of alternately flashing yellow lights. These lights

are used to denote both the presence of an active

runway and identify the location of a runway holding

position marking.

• Geographic position markings—ATC verifies the

position of aircraft and vehicles using geographic

position markings. The markings can be used either

as hold points or for position reporting. These

checkpoints or “pink spots” are outlined with a black

and white circle and designated with a number or a

number and a letter.

Figure 1-3. Excerpts from the Chart Supplement (Airport Facility Directory section) of Naples Muni, Naples, Florida.

• Clearance bar lights—three yellow in-pavement

clearance bar lights used to denote holding

positions for aircraft and vehicles. When used for

hold points, they are co-located with geographic

position markings.

Both flight and ground crews, Part 121 and 135 operators, are

required to comply with SMGCS plans when implemented

at their specific airport. All airport tenants are responsible

for disseminating information to their employees and

conducting training in low visibility operating procedures.

Anyone operating in conjunction with the SMGCS plan

must have a copy of the low visibility taxi route chart for

their given airport as these charts outline the taxi routes

and other detailed information concerning low visibility

operations. These charts are available from private sources

outside of the FAA. Government sources for SMGCS

charts may be available in the future. Part 91 operators

are expected to comply with the guidelines listed in AC

120-57, and should expect “Follow Me” service (when

available) when low visibility operations are in use. Any

SMGCS outage that would adversely affect operations at

the airport is issued as a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM).

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance Control

System (A-SMGCS)

With the increasing demand for airports to accommodate

higher levels of aircraft movements, it is becoming more

difficult for the existing infrastructure to safely handle

greater capacities of traffic in all weather conditions. As

a result, the FAA is implementing runway safety systems,

such as Airport Surface Detection Equipment-Model X

(ASDE-X) and Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and

Control System (A-SMGCS) at various airports. The data that

these systems use comes from surface movement radar

and aircraft transponders. The combination of these data

sources allows the systems to determine the position and

identification of aircraft on the airport movement area and

decreases the potential of collisions on airport runways

and taxiways.

Additional information concerning airport lighting,

markings, and signs can be found in the Aeronautical

Information Manual (AIM) and the Pilot’s Handbook of

A A

Runway holding position marking and lights for land and hold short operations (LAHSO)

Painted taxiway direction sign

Painted taxiway location sign

Taxiway centerline marking

Not under ATC controlUnder ATC

control

Taxiway edge marking (do not cross)

Centerline/lead-on lights

Stop bar at instrument landing system hold position

Broken taxiway edge markings may be crossed

Painted

holding

position

sign

Low

visibility

hold

point

Vehicle lanes

Reporting points

In-pavement runway guard lights

Figure 1-4. Key airport lighting and markings.

Aeronautical Knowledge, appendix 1, as well as on the FAA’s

website at http://www.faa.gov/airports/runway_safety/.

Airport Signs, Lighting, and Markings

Flight crews use airport lighting, markings, and signs to

help maintain situational awareness. These visual aids

provide information concerning the aircraft’s location on

the airport, the taxiway in use, and the runway entrance

being used. Overlooking this information can lead to

ground accidents that are entirely preventable. If you

encounter unfamiliar markings or lighting, contact ATC

for clarification and, if necessary, request progressive taxi

instructions. Pilots are encouraged to notify the appropriate

authorities of erroneous, misleading, or decaying signs or

lighting that would contribute to the failure of safe ground

operations.

Runway Incursions

On any given day, the NAS may handle almost 200,000

takeoffs and landings. Due to the complex nature of the

airport environment and the intricacies of the network of

people that make it operate efficiently, the FAA is constantly

looking to maintain the high standard of safety that exists

at airports today. Runway safety is one of its top priorities.

The FAA defines a runway incursion as: “Any occurrence

at an aerodrome involving the incorrect presence of an

aircraft, vehicle, or person on the protected area of a surface

designated for the landing and takeoff of aircraft. ”

The four categories of runway incursions are listed below:

• Category A—a serious incident in which a collision

was narrowly avoided.

• Category B—an incident in which separation

decreases and there is a significant potential for

Figure 1-5. FAA recommendations for reducing runway incursions.

The FAA recommends that you:

• Receive and understand all NOTAMs, particularly

those concerning airport construction and lighting.

• Read back, in full, all clearances involving

holding short, line up and wait, and crossing runways

to ensure proper understanding.

• Abide by the sterile cockpit rule.

• Develop operational procedures that minimize

distractions during taxiing.

• Ask ATC for directions if you are lost or unsure of

your position on the airport.

• Adhere to takeoff and runway crossing clearances in

a timely manner.

• Position your aircraft so landing traffic can see you.

• Monitor radio communications to maintain a

situational awareness of other aircraft.

• Remain on frequency until instructed to change.

• Make sure you know the reduced runway distances

and whether or not you can comply before accepting

a land and hold short clearance or clearance for

shortened runway.

• Report confusing airport diagrams to the proper

authorities.

• Use exterior taxi and landing lights when practical.

The sterile cockpit rule refers to a concept outlined in 14 CFR

Part 121, § 121.542 and 135.100 that requires flight

crews to refrain from engaging in activities that could distract

them from the performance of their duties during critical phases

of flight.

NOTE:

collision that may result in a time critical corrective/

evasive response to avoid a collision.

• Category C—an incident characterized by ample

time and/or distance to avoid a collision.

• Category D—an incident that meets the definition

of runway incursion, such as incorrect presence of a

single vehicle/person/aircraft on the protected area

of a surface designated for the landing and takeoff of

aircraft but with no immediate safety consequences.

Figure 1-5 highlights several steps that reduce the chances

of being involved in a runway incursion.

In addition to the SMGCS program, the FAA has implemented

additional programs to reduce runway incursions and other

surface movement issues. They identified runway hotspots,

designed standardized taxi routes, and instituted the

Runway Safety Program.

Runway Hotspots

ICAO defines runway hotspots as a location on an

aerodrome movement area with a history or potential risk

of collision or runway incursion and where heightened

attention by pilots and drivers is necessary. Hotspots

alert pilots to complex or potentially confusing taxiway

geometry that could make surface navigation challenging.

Whatever the reason, pilots need to be aware that

these hazardous intersections exist, and they should

be increasingly vigilant when approaching and taxiing

through these intersections. These hotspots are depicted

on some airport charts as circled areas. [Figure 1-6] The FAA

Office of Runway Safety has links to the FAA regions that

maintain a complete list of airports with runway hotspots

at http://www.faa.gov/airports/runway_safety.

Standardized Taxi Routes

Standard taxi routes improve ground management at high-

density airports, namely those that have airline service. At

these airports, typical taxiway traffic patterns used to move

aircraft between gate and runway are laid out and coded.

The ATC specialist (ATCS) can reduce radio communication

time and eliminate taxi instruction misinterpretation by

simply clearing the pilot to taxi via a specific, named route.

An example of this would be Los Angeles International

Airport (KLAX), where North Route is used to transition

to Runway 24L. [Figure 1-7] These routes are issued by

ground control, and if unable to comply, pilots must

advise ground control on initial contact. If for any reason

the pilot becomes uncertain as to the correct taxi route, a

request should be made for progressive taxi instructions.

These step-by-step routing directions are also issued if the

controller deems it necessary due to traffic, closed taxiways,

airport construction, etc. It is the pilot’s responsibility to

know if a particular airport has preplanned taxi routes, to

be familiar with them, and to have the taxi descriptions in

their possession. Specific information about airports that

use coded taxiway routes is included in the Notices to

Airmen Publication (NTAP).

NOT FOR NAVIGATION

SAMPLE NOT FOR ACTUAL USE

At Long Beach/Daugherty Field Airport, the following areas have been

designated as hot spots, posing a special challenge to pilots.

HOT6

Landing Runway 30

Be aware that this runway crosses every other available runway

at the airport. When exiting the runway, pilots should make sure

they are turning with a “lead-off” taxiline onto a taxiway and not

onto another active runway.

HOT1

Runway 25R and Taxiway D

Aircraft exiting runway 30 at taxiway A turn

left on taxiway D, anticipate reaching their

destination, and fail to hold short of runway

25R.

HOT2

Runway 12 and Taxiway B

Aircraft northbound on taxiway B for departure

on runway 16R at taxiway intersection D miss

the right turn onto taxiway D and enter

runways 12, 7L, and 25R.

HOT3

Runway 25L/7R at Taxiway B

Aircraft southbound on taxiway B anticipate

reaching their destination parking ramp and

fail to hold short of runway 25L/7R.

HOT4

Runway 16R/34L at Taxiway F

Aircraft taxiing to runway 16R from the

southwest ramp miss the left turn onto

taxiway B, continue eastbound onto taxiway

F, and enter runway 16R/34L.

HOT5

Runway 25L at Taxiway D

After completing a runup on inactive runway

34R, aircraft fail to hold short of runway 25L.

Figure 1-6. Example of runway hot spots located at Long Beach/Daugherty Field Airport (KLGB).

SW-3, 29 JUL 2010 to 26 AUG 2010

Standardized Taxi Routes for Los Angeles

International Airport (KLAX)

The following Standardized Taxi routes

may be issued to all taxiing aircraft.

North Route

Taxi via Charlie (C) towards taxiway Sierra (S) taxi northbound on taxiway Sierra (S),

and at Check-point-1 contact Ground Control on frequency 121.65, hold short of

taxiway Delta (D). When advised by the north Ground Control, the North Route

continues on taxiway Echo (E) to Runway 24L or the gate, whichever applies.

South Route

If the aircraft is west of taxiway Romeo (R), taxi eastbound on taxiway Echo (E) and

turn right on taxiway Romeo (R), if the aircraft is east of taxiway Romeo (R), taxi

westbound on taxiway Echo (E) and turn left on taxiway Romeo (R). And at

Check-point-2, contact Ground Control on frequency 121.75, hold short of taxiway

Charlie (C).

West Route

Taxi via taxiway Charlie (C) west-bound, hold short of taxiway Alfa Alfa (AA), contact

Ground Control on frequency 121.65 when number one approaching Taxiway AA.

Bridge Route

Taxi via taxiway Echo (E) then south on taxiway Alfa Alfa (AA), and at Check-point-3

contact Ground Control on frequency 121.75, hold short of taxiway Charlie (C).

(AJV-W2 4/23/2010)

North Route

SW-3, 29 JUL 2010 to 26 AUG 2010

Figure 1-7. Los Angeles International Airport diagram, North Route, and standardized taxi route.

Taxi and Movement Operations Change

As of June 30, 2010, controllers are required to issue explicit

instructions to cross or hold short of each runway that

intersects a taxi route. Following is a summary of these

procedural changes:

• “Taxi to” is no longer used when issuing taxi

instructions to an assigned takeoff runway.

• Instructions to cross a runway are issued one at a

time. Instructions to cross multiple runways are not

issued. An aircraft or vehicle must have crossed the

previous runway before another runway crossing

is issued. This applies to any runway, including

inactive or closed runways.

• Never cross a runway hold marking without explicit

ATC instructions. If in doubt, ask!

Reminder: You may not enter a runway unless you have

been:

1. Instructed to cross or taxi onto that specific runway;

2. Cleared to take off from that runway; or

3. Instructed to line up and wait on that specific runway.

For more information on the change, refer to FAA Order

JO 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, which can be found at www.

faa.gov.

Weather and the Departure Environment

Takeoff Minimums

While mechanical failure is potentially hazardous during

any phase of flight, a failure during takeoff under

instrument conditions is extremely critical. In the event of

an emergency, a decision must be made to either return to

the departure airport or fly directly to a takeoff alternate. If

the departure weather were below the landing minimums

for the departure airport, the flight would be unable to

return for landing, leaving few options and little time to

reach a takeoff alternate.

In the early years of air transportation, landing minimums

for commercial operators were usually lower than takeoff

minimums. Therefore, it was possible that minimums

allowed pilots to land at an airport but not depart from that

airport. Additionally, all takeoff minimums once included

ceiling, as well as visibility requirements. Today, takeoff

minimums are typically lower than published landing

minimums, and ceiling requirements are only included if

it is necessary to see and avoid obstacles in the departure

area.

The FAA establishes takeoff minimums for every airport

that has published Standard Instrument Approaches.

These minimums are used by commercially operated

aircraft, namely Part 121 and Part 135 operators. At airports

where minimums are not established, these same carriers

are required to use FAA-designated standard minimums:

1 statute mile (SM) visibility for single- and twin-engine

aircraft, and 1⁄2 SM for helicopters and aircraft with more

than two engines.

Aircraft operating under 14 CFR Part 91 are not required to

comply with established takeoff minimums. Legally, a zero/

zero departure may be made, but it is never advisable. If

commercial pilots who fly passengers on a daily basis must

comply with takeoff minimums, then good judgment and

common sense would tell all instrument pilots to follow

the established minimums as well.

Aeronautical Information Services charts list takeoff

minimums only for the runways at airports that have other

than standard minimums. These takeoff minimums are

listed by airport in alphabetical order in the front of the TPP

booklet. If an airport has non-standard takeoff minimums,

a T (referred to by some as either the “triangle T” or “trouble

T”) is placed in the notes sections of the instrument

procedure chart. In the front of the TPP booklet, takeoff

minimums are listed before the obstacle departure

procedure. Some departure procedures allow a departure

with standard minimums provided specific aircraft

performance requirements are met. [Figure 1-8]

Takeoff Minimums for Commercial Operators

While Part 121 and Part 135 operators are the primary users

of takeoff minimums, they may be able to use alternative

takeoff minimums based on their individual OpSpecs.

Through these OpSpecs, operators are authorized to depart

with lower-than-standard minimums provided they have

the necessary equipment and crew training.

Operations Specifications (OpSpecs)

Within the air transportation industry, there is a need to

establish and administer safety standards to accommodate

many variables. These variables include a wide range

of aircraft, varied operator capabilities, the various

situations requiring different types of air transportation,

and the continual, rapid changes in aviation technology.

It is impractical to address these variables through the

promulgation of safety regulations for each and every

type of air transport situation and the varying degrees of

operator capabilities. Also, it is impractical to address the

Original source PDFPublished from pages 17–24 of the recorded source chapter.
Open source PDF ↗