InfoDotInc / archive systemEstablished online record · rebuilding deliberately
InfoDotInc

Technical documents, historic paths, and source-backed reference material.

Archive / FAA Instrument Procedures Handbook / FAA Instrument Procedures Handbook: Chapter 1 — Departure Procedures

Chapter 1 — Departure Procedures — Part 5

Chapter 1 — Departure Procedures — Part 5

FAA-H-8083-16B (2017)

Figure 1-28. Flight plan equipment codes (continued on next page).

P1 - P9

GBAS landing system

LPV (APV with SBAS)

LORAN C

DME

FMC WPR ACARS

D-FIS ACARS

PDC ACARS

ADF

GNSS (See Note 2)

HF RTF

Intertial Navigation

CPDLC ATN VDL Mode 2 (See Note 3)

CPDLC FANS 1/A HFDL

CPDLC FANS 1/A VDL Mode 4

CPDLC FANS 1/A VDL Mode 2

CPDLC FANS 1/A SATCOM (INMARSAT)

CPDLC FANS 1/A SATCOM (MTSAT)

CPDLC FANS 1/A SATCOM (Iridium)

MLS

ILS

OmegaATC RTF SATCOM

ATC RTF (MTSAT)

ATC RTF (Iridium)

VOR

Reserved for RCP

PBN approved (see Note 4)

TACAN

UHF RTF

VHF RTF

RVSM approved

MNPS approved

VHF with 8.33 kHz channel spacing capability

Other equipment carried or other capabilities

(see Note 5)

ICAO Flight Plan Equipment Codes

Suffix

/X

/T

/U

/D

/B

/A

/M

/N

/P

/Y

/C

/I

/E

/F

/G

/R

/J

/K

/L

/Q

/W

Equipment Capability

NO DME

No transponder

Transponder with no Mode C

Transponder with Mode C

DME

No transponder

Transponder with no Mode C

Transponder with Mode C

TACAN ONLY

No transponder

Transponder with no Mode C

Transponder with Mode C

AREA NAVIGATION (RNAV)

LORAN, VOR/DME, or INS with no transponder

LORAN, VOR/DME, or INS, transponder with no

Mode C

LORAN, VOR/DME, or INS, transponder with

Mode C

ADVANCED RNAV WITH TRANSPONDER AND

MODE C (If an aircraft is unable to operate with a

transponder and/or Mode C, it will revert to the

appropriate code listed above under Area

Navigation.)

Flight Management System (FMS) with DME/DME

and IRU position updating

Flight Management System (FMS) with DME/DME

position updating

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS),

including GPS or WAAS, with en route and

terminal capability.

Required Navigational Performance (RNP). The

aircraft meets the RNP type prescribed for the

route segment(s), route(s), and/or area concerned.

Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM).

Prior to conducting RVSM operations within the

U.S., the operator must obtain authorization from

the FAA or from the responsible authority, as

appropriate.

/E with RVSM

/F with RVSM

/G with RVSM

/R with RVSM

RVSM

FAA Flight Plan Aircraft Suffixes

Radio communication, navigation and approach

aid equipment and capabilities

“N” if no COM/NAV/approach aid equipment for the route to be

flown is carried, or the equipment is unserviceable, OR “S” if standard

COM/NAV/ approach aid equipment for the route to be flown is

carried and serviceable (see note 1), AND/OR INSERT one or more of

the following letters to indicate the serviceable COM/NAV/approach

aid equipment and capabilities available:

Any alphanumeric characters not indicated above are reserved.

Effective September 1, 2005.

Transponder - Mode A (4 digits - 4,096 codes)

Transponder - Mode A (4 digits - 4,096 codes) and

Mode C

Transponder—Mode S, including aircraft identification,

pressure-altitude and extended squitter (ADS-B)

capability

Transponder—Mode S, including aircraft identification,

pressure-altitude and enhanced surveillance capability

Transponder—Mode S, including aircraft identification,

but no pressure-altitude capability

Transponder—Mode S, including aircraft identification,

pressure-altitude, extended squitter (ADS-B) and

enhanced surveillance capability

Transponder—Mode S, including pressure-altitude, but

no aircraft identification capability

Transponder—Mode S, including both pressure altitude

and aircraft identification capability

Transponder — Mode S with neither aircraft

identification nor pressure-altitude capability

ADS-B with dedicated 1090 MHz ADS-B “out” capability

ADS-B with dedicated 1090 MHz ADS-B “out” and “in”

capability

ADS-B “out” capability using UAT

ADS-B “out” and “in” capability using UAT

ADS-B “out” capability using VDL Mode 4

ADS-B “out” and “in” capability using VDL Mode 4

ICAO Flight Plan Equipment Codes

Surveillance equipment and capabilities

SSR Modes A and C

SSR Modes S

ADS-B

INSERT N if no surveillance equipment for the route to be flown

is carried, or the equipment is unserviceable, OR INSERT one or

more of the following descriptors, to a maximum of 20 characters,

to describe the serviceable surveillance equipment carried and/or

capabilities on board:

Note: Enhanced surveillance capability is the ability of the aircraft

to down-link aircraft derived data via a Mode S transponder.

Note 1

Note 2

Note 3

Note 4

Note 5

Note 6

Note 7

Note 8

Note 9

Note 10

Note 11

If the letter S is used, standard equipment is considered

to be VHF RTF, VOR and ILS, unless another combina­

tion is prescribed by the appropriate ATS authority.

If the letter G is used, the types of external GNSS

augmentation, if any, are specified in Item 18 following

the indicator NAV/ and separated by a space.

See RTCA/EUROCAE Interoperability Requirements

Standard For ATN Baseline 1 (ATN B1 INTEROP Standard

DO-280B/ED-110B) for data link services air traffic

control clearance and information/air traffic control

communications management/air traffic control

microphone check.

Information on navigation capability is provided to

ATC for clearance and routing purposes.

If the letter Z is used, specify in Item 18 the other

equipment carried or other capabilities, preceded

by COM/, NAV/ and/or DAT, as appropriate.

If the letter R is used, the performance based naviga­

tion levels that can be met are specified in Item 18

following the indicator PBN/. Guidance material on the

application of performance based navigation to a

specific route segment, route or area is contained in

the Performance-Based Navigation Manual (Doc 9613).

RNAV- equipped aircraft capable of flying RNAV SIDs,

putting “NO SID” in the remarks section will not always

result in a clearance via a Preferential Departure Route

(PDR). The Pilot/Dispatcher must amend Field 18 NAV

from D1 to D0 and remove PBRN RNAV1 Code (D1-D4).

If a RNAV DP is filed, an ICAO flight plan must be used.

In Field 18, Pilots/Dispatchers must file a D1 or D2

depending on the RNAV DP . Additionally, Field 18

should include PBN/D1-D4 depending on the naviga­

tion update source. See AIM/PANS ATM 4444 for ICAO

filing procedures.

RNAV Q-routes require en route RNAV 2, corresponding

NAV/E2 code and PBN/C1-C4 based on navigation

system update source.

If an aircraft does not meet the requirements for RVSM,

then the W filed in ICAO flight plan Field 10A must be

removed and STS/NONRVSM must be annotated in

Field 18.

Filing requirements for RNAV STARS. Field 18 of the

ICAO flight plan must have a NAV/A1 or A2 assigned to

the RNAV STAR. Additionally, PBN/D1-D4 for RNAV1 or

C1-C4 for RNAV2 should be filed. If unable to accept the

RNAV STAR, the flight plan must be amended to change

the NAV/A1 or A2 to A0.

D1 ADS-C with FANS 1/A capabilities

G1 ADS-C with ATN capabilities

Alphanumeric characters not indicated above are reserved.

Example: ADE3RV/HB2U2V2G1

Note: Additional surveillance application should be listed in

Item 18 following the indicator SUR/ .

NOTE

Figure 1-28. Flight plan equipment codes (continued).

interdependent, capacity diminishing routes. RNAV is a

method of navigation that permits aircraft operation on

any desired flight path within the coverage of ground- or

spaced- based NAVAIDs or within the limits of the capability

of self-contained aids or a combination of these. In the

future, there will be an increased dependence on the

use of RNAV in lieu of routes defined by ground-based

NAVAIDs. As a part of the evolving RNAV structure, the

FAA has developed departure procedures for pilots flying

aircraft equipped with some type of RNAV technology.

RNAV allows for the creation of new departure routes

that are independent of present fixes and NAVAIDs. RNAV

routing is part of the National Airspace Redesign (NAR) and

is expected to reduce complexity and increase efficiency

of terminal airspace.

When new RNAV departure procedures are designed,

they will require minimal vectoring and communications

between pilots and ATC. Usually, each departure procedure

includes position, time, and altitude, which increase

the ability to predict what the pilot will actually do.

RNAV departure procedures have the ability to increase

the capacity of terminal airspace by increasing on-

time departures, airspace utilization, and improved

predictability.

All public RNAV SIDs and graphic ODPs are RNAV 1. These

procedures generally start with an initial RNAV or heading

leg near the departure end runway. In addition, these

procedures require system performance currently met

by GPS, DME/DME/Inertial Reference Unit (IRU) RNAV

systems that satisfy the criteria discussed in AC 90-100, U.S.

Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations.

RNAV departures are identifiable by the inclusion of the

term RNAV in the title of the departure. From a required

navigation performance (RNP) standpoint, RNAV departure

routes are designed with 1 or 2 NM performance standards

as listed below. This means you as the pilot and your aircraft

equipment must be able to maintain the aircraft within 1

or 2 NM either side of route centerline. [Figure 1-27]

• RNAV 1 procedures require that the aircraft’s total

system error remain bounded by ±1 NM for 95

percent of the total flight time.

• RNAV 2 requires a total system error of not more

than 2 NM for 95 percent of the total flight time.

RNP is RNAV with on-board monitoring and alerting; RNP is

also a statement of navigation performance necessary for

operation within defined airspace. RNP 1 (in-lieu-of RNAV

1) is used when a DP that contains a constant radius to a

fix (RF) leg or when surveillance (radar) monitoring is not

desired for when DME/DME/IRU is used. These procedures

are annotated with a standard note: “RNP 1. ”

If unable to comply with the requirements of an RNAV

or RNP procedure, pilots need to advise ATC as soon as

possible. For example, “N1234, failure of GPS system,

unable RNAV, request amended clearance. ” Pilots are not

authorized to fly a published RNAV or RNP procedure unless

it is retrievable by the procedure name from the navigation

database and conforms to the charted procedure. No other

modification of database waypoints or creation of user-

defined waypoints on published RNAV or RNP procedures

is permitted, except to change altitude and/or airspeed

waypoint constraints to comply with an ATC clearance/

instruction, or to insert a waypoint along the published

route to assist in complying with an ATC instruction. For

example, “Climb via the WILIT departure except cross 30

north of CHUCK at/ or above FL 210. ” This is limited only

to systems that allow along track waypoint construction.

Pilots of aircraft utilizing DME/DME for primary navigation

updating should ensure any required DME stations are in

service as determined by NOTAM, ATIS, or ATC advisory.

DME/DME navigation system updating may require specific

DME facilities to meet performance standards. Based on

DME availability evaluations at the time of publication,

current DME coverage is not sufficient to support DME/DME

RNAV operations everywhere without IRU augmentation or

use of GPS. [Figure 1-28] DP chart notes may also include

operational information for certain types of equipment,

systems, and performance requirements, in addition to

the type of RNAV departure procedure.

While operating on RNAV segments, pilots are encouraged

to use the flight director in lateral navigation mode. RNAV

terminal procedures may be amended by ATC issuing radar

vectors and/or clearances direct to a waypoint. Pilots should

avoid premature manual deletion of waypoints from their

active “legs” page to allow for rejoining procedures. While

operating on RNAV segments, pilots operating /R aircraft

should adhere to any flight manual limitation or operating

procedure required to maintain the RNP value specified for

the procedure. In 2008, the FAA implemented the use of

en route host automation ICAO flight plan (FP) processing

for requesting assignment of RNAV SID, Standard Terminal

Arrivals (STARs), or RNAV routes U.S. domestic airspace.

This is part of a risk reduction strategy for introduction of

the En Route Automation Modernization (ERAM) system in

October 2008. ERAM also will use ICAO FP processing and as

a result aircrews should be aware that as the FAA updates to

ERAM the standard FAA flight plan equipment suffix codes

will change to the ICAO flight plan equipment suffix codes.

For procedures requiring GPS and/or aircraft approvals

requiring GPS, if the navigation system does not

automatically alert the flight crew of a loss of GPS, aircraft

operators must develop procedures to verify correct GPS

Figure 1-29. Examples of RNAV SID.

Figure 1-30. Examples of RNAV ODP .

NOT FOR NAVIGATION

A fly-over (FO) waypoint precludes any turn until the waypoint is overflown.

A fly-by (FB) waypoint requires the use of turn

anticipation to avoid overshooting the next segment.

Figure 1-31. Fly-over and fly-by waypoints.

operation. If not equipped with GPS, or for multi-sensor

systems with GPS that do not alert upon loss of GPS, aircraft

must be capable of navigation system updating using DME/

DME or DME/DME/ IRU for type 1 and 2 procedures. AC 90­

100 may be used as operational guidance for RNAV ODPs.

Pilots of FMS-equipped aircraft who are assigned an RNAV

DP procedure and subsequently receive a change of runway,

transition, or procedure, must verify that the appropriate

changes are loaded and available for navigation. [Figures

1-29 and 1-30]

Additionally, new waypoint symbols are used in conjunction

with RNAV charts. There are two types of waypoints

currently in use: fly-by (FB) and fly-over (FO). A FB waypoint

typically is used in a position at which a change in the course

of procedure occurs. Charts represent them with four-

pointed stars. This type of waypoint is designed to allow

you to anticipate and begin your turn prior to reaching the

waypoint, thus providing smoother transitions. Conversely,

RNAV charts show a FO waypoint as a four-pointed star

enclosed in a circle. This type of waypoint is used to denote

a missed approach point, a missed approach holding

point, or other specific points in space that must be flown

over. [Figure 1-31] Pilots should not change any database

waypoint type from a FB to FO, or vice versa.

There are specific requirements; however, that must be met

before using RNAV procedures. Every RNAV departure chart

lists general notes and may include specific equipment and

performance requirements, as well as the type of RNAV

departure procedure in the chart plan view. New aircraft

equipment suffix codes are used to denote capabilities for

advanced RNAV navigation for flight plan filing purposes.

[Figure 1-32]

SID Altitudes

SID altitudes can be charted in four different ways. The

first are mandatory altitudes, the second, minimum

altitudes, the third, maximum altitudes and the fourth is a

combination of minimum and maximum altitudes or also

referred to as block altitudes. Below are examples of how

each will be shown on a SID chart.

• Mandatory altitudes – 5500

• Minimum altitudes – 2300

• Maximum altitudes – 3300

NOT FOR NAVIGATION

Aircraft system operation requirements

Figure 1-32. Operation requirements for RNAV.

• Combination of minimum and maximum – 7000

Some SIDs may still have “(ATC)” adjacent to a crossing

altitude as shown in Figure 1-33 which implies that the

crossing altitude is there to support an ATC requirement.

A new charting standard has begun a process to remove,

over a period of time, the ATC annotation. The Cowboy

Four Departure (RNAV) shown in Figure 1-34 depicts the

new charting standard without ATC annotations. When

necessary, ATC may amend or delete SID crossing altitude

restrictions; when doing so, ATC assumes responsibility

for obstacle clearance until the aircraft is re-established

laterally and vertically on the published SID route.

Pilot Responsibility for Use of RNAV Departures

RNAV usage brings with it multitudes of complications

as it is being implemented. It takes time to transition,

to disseminate information, and to educate current

and potential users. As a current pilot using the NAS,

you need to have a clear understanding of the aircraft

equipment requirements for operating in a given RNP

environment. You must understand the type of navigation

system installed in your aircraft, and furthermore, you

must know how your system operates to ensure that

you can comply with all RNAV requirements. Operational

information should be included in your AFM or its

supplements. Additional information concerning how

to use your equipment to its fullest capacity, including

“how to” training, may be gathered from your avionics

manufacturer. If you are in doubt about the operation of

your avionics system and its ability to comply with RNAV

requirements, contact the FAA directly through your local

Flight Standards District Office (FSDO). RNAV departure

procedures are being developed at a rapid pace to provide

RNAV capabilities at all airports. With every chart revision

cycle, new RNAV departures are being added for small

and large airports. These departures are flown in the same

manner as traditional navigation-based departures; pilots

are provided headings, altitudes, navigation waypoint,

and departure descriptions. RNAV SIDs are found in the

TPP with traditional departure procedures.

Original source PDFPublished from pages 47–53 of the recorded source chapter.
Open source PDF ↗